Optics: I do not understand what this question is asking

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xyius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves understanding the ratio of irradiance at a specific point in the diffraction pattern of a single slit, where the point is described as being 3/4 of a wavelength farther from one edge of the slit than the other. The context is within the subject area of optics, specifically Fraunhofer diffraction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion regarding the interpretation of the problem, particularly the meaning of being "3/4 of a wavelength farther" and the implications for the slit length. There is a discussion about relating the problem to coherent light sources and how this affects amplitude and intensity.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights that help clarify the problem, suggesting ways to think about the relationship between amplitude and intensity. Others are still grappling with the initial setup and definitions, indicating a mix of understanding and uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of needing additional information, such as the slit length, to fully grasp the problem. Participants are also questioning the phrasing of the problem, particularly the reference to "the other" point, which adds to the ambiguity.

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Call the irradiance at the center of the central Fraunhofer diffraction maximum of a single slit [itex]I_0[/itex] and the irradiance at some other point in the patterm I. Obtain the ratio [itex]I/I_0[/itex] for some point on the screen that is 3/4 of a wavelength farther from one edge of the slit than the other.


Homework Equations


Irradiance for single slit diffraction
[tex]I=I_0sinc^2(β)[/tex]
[tex]β=\frac{1}{2}kbsin\theta[/tex]
[tex]k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}[/tex]
b=slit size

The Attempt at a Solution


Well I know that when beta is equal to zero, the irradiance is at its maximum. But I do not know if this helps me or not. I honestly do not understand the question. 3/4 of a wavelength farther from one edge of the slit than the other? Don't I need the slit length? How can I make use of this information? Why does it say "than the other." What other point?

I really want to understand this problem. If anyone can help me I would much appreciate it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xyius said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Well I know that when beta is equal to zero, the irradiance is at its maximum. But I do not know if this helps me or not. I honestly do not understand the question. 3/4 of a wavelength farther from one edge of the slit than the other? Don't I need the slit length? How can I make use of this information? Why does it say "than the other." What other point?

I really want to understand this problem. If anyone can help me I would much appreciate it!
Think of two coherent light sources, one at each edge of the slit. At a point that is 3/4 of a wavelength farther from one of those two sources than the other, how would the amplitude of the combined wave compare to the amplitude at a point where there was full constructive interference (maximum amplitude). How would the intensities be related? (ie how is intensity related to amplitude?).

AM
 
In other words you don't need a variable if you have a way to cancel it using the given information and perhaps setting up two equations or a ratio
 
Ohh! Okay that makes sense now! Thanks guys, I will give it a shot tomorrow. (Just finished studying :p)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K