Optics: I do not understand what this question is asking

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xyius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Call the irradiance at the center of the central Fraunhofer diffraction maximum of a single slit [itex]I_0[/itex] and the irradiance at some other point in the patterm I. Obtain the ratio [itex]I/I_0[/itex] for some point on the screen that is 3/4 of a wavelength farther from one edge of the slit than the other.


Homework Equations


Irradiance for single slit diffraction
[tex]I=I_0sinc^2(β)[/tex]
[tex]β=\frac{1}{2}kbsin\theta[/tex]
[tex]k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}[/tex]
b=slit size

The Attempt at a Solution


Well I know that when beta is equal to zero, the irradiance is at its maximum. But I do not know if this helps me or not. I honestly do not understand the question. 3/4 of a wavelength farther from one edge of the slit than the other? Don't I need the slit length? How can I make use of this information? Why does it say "than the other." What other point?

I really want to understand this problem. If anyone can help me I would much appreciate it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xyius said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Well I know that when beta is equal to zero, the irradiance is at its maximum. But I do not know if this helps me or not. I honestly do not understand the question. 3/4 of a wavelength farther from one edge of the slit than the other? Don't I need the slit length? How can I make use of this information? Why does it say "than the other." What other point?

I really want to understand this problem. If anyone can help me I would much appreciate it!
Think of two coherent light sources, one at each edge of the slit. At a point that is 3/4 of a wavelength farther from one of those two sources than the other, how would the amplitude of the combined wave compare to the amplitude at a point where there was full constructive interference (maximum amplitude). How would the intensities be related? (ie how is intensity related to amplitude?).

AM
 
In other words you don't need a variable if you have a way to cancel it using the given information and perhaps setting up two equations or a ratio
 
Ohh! Okay that makes sense now! Thanks guys, I will give it a shot tomorrow. (Just finished studying :p)