How Can Light Transmission and Reflection Exceed 100% in an Optics Experiment?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of light transmission and reflection exceeding 100% in an optics experiment involving a glass or plastic dish. Participants noted that 55% of the light was transmitted and 55% reflected, leading to a hypothesis that the glass could be in an excited state, releasing additional light upon interaction with incoming photons. Testing this hypothesis would involve placing the dish in a vacuum at near absolute zero and measuring emitted electromagnetic radiation with a spectrometer. Alternative explanations included the presence of a semi-reflective surface behind the dish and the relativistic Doppler effect influencing perceived intensity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of light transmission and reflection principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of absorbance in optics
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic radiation and spectrometry
  • Basic principles of quantum states and energy conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of light absorbance and transmission in materials
  • Learn about the functionality and application of spectrometers in measuring electromagnetic radiation
  • Investigate the effects of temperature on material properties at near absolute zero
  • Explore the relativistic Doppler effect and its implications in optics
USEFUL FOR

Optics researchers, physics students, and professionals in experimental physics who are interested in advanced light behavior and measurement techniques.

erisedk
Messages
372
Reaction score
7
You have a glass (or plastic) dish (like a small transparent dish). You shine light onto its flat surface. Your lab partner discovers that 55% of the light has been transmitted, 55% is reflected. What is the absorbance of the dish (not in the log scale, just as a regular %age)?
State a hypothesis and the way you would test it.

I was asked this today in an interview. This is what I said-

So, clearly the answer can't be -10, right, cos that just violates energy conservation.

So I think that the glass itself could have been in an excited state and therefore, when we shone light on it, it sort of got de-excited because of the collisions with the incoming light photons and therefore, we got more light than the total incoming light released.

Also, the way that we would test this hypothesis is by taking the glass thing into a vacuum, in darkness and with temperatures close to 0 K and measuring any electromagnetic radiation being emitted from the same.

We could measure that using a spectrometer sort of thing (like infrared glasses measure heat, and we can see bodies glowing).

This is what I said during the interview. The interviewer (when he'd asked me what I liked to do, I'd said I like to sit and think, and browse the internet) then said that I should now think up 9 more solutions to this problem since that's my favourite pastime and email it to him.

Other solutions I've thought of:

1. Maybe there's a semi-reflective surface behind the dish, off of which the transmitted light bounced, and went back through the dish, reading as reflected light.

2. Relativistic doppler effect could alter the intensity perceived by the glass.

Could there be any other answers?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
erisedk said:
You have a glass (or plastic) dish (like a small transparent dish). You shine light onto its flat surface.
Why does the question say "dish" if only the flat part is investigated? Is the curved part not receiving any light? What exactly is measured, and how?
 
A.T. said:
Why does the question say "dish" if only the flat part is investigated? Is the curved part not receiving any light? What exactly is measured, and how?
That's just what I remember of how he phrased it. It doesn't really have much significance. The curved part is receiving light. I just have a laser beam that I'm shining on a small glass dish.
 
erisedk said:
The curved part is receiving light.
Can it focus the reflected / refracted light so you get increased intensity at the sensors?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K