Optimization of a rectangle's area in two parabolas

  • Thread starter Thread starter cinematic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Optimization
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around maximizing the area of a rectangle formed between the curves y1=x²-k and y2=x²+k. Participants question whether the rectangle should be oriented sideways, as this could potentially yield a larger area compared to one aligned with the axes. The use of k=1 is debated, with suggestions to keep k as a variable for generality. Concerns are raised about the appropriateness of this problem for a first-year calculus course, given its complexity involving optimization in two variables. The conversation highlights the potential for innovative solutions while acknowledging the challenges posed by the problem's requirements.
cinematic
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the maximum area of a rectangle formed in the region formed by the two curves
y1=x2 - k
y2=x2 + k


Homework Equations


The equations are given, I tried using k=1. so y1= x2 - 1, etc.


The Attempt at a Solution


Is it true that the rectangle has to be sideways (i.e. NOT parallel to the axes in order to maximize the area of the rectangle?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why take k = 1? Just leave it as k. Is this problem from a typical first year calculus text? The reason I ask is I would be very surprised if it is asking you to consider rectangles not parallel to the axes. I don't know offhand if the maximum would be attained by a slanted rectangle since I have never seen that problem worked, worked it myself, or even asked for that matter.
 
Actually, this is an extension on first-time calculus. Our teacher was suggesting if it was possible that by tilting the rectangle, so to speak, the maximized area would be obtained, or if it was in the question's best interest to assume a rectangle with sides parallel to the x-axis.
 
cinematic said:
Actually, this is an extension on first-time calculus. Our teacher was suggesting if it was possible that by tilting the rectangle, so to speak, the maximized area would be obtained, or if it was in the question's best interest to assume a rectangle with sides parallel to the x-axis.

I didn't know a question had a "best interest" :smile:

The difficulty of having that problem in a first course is that it would be an optimization problem in two variables. If you haven't had that yet, it would presumably be beyond your abilities. Still, it might be an interesting problem given you had the background.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K