MHB Optimization on non-compact (multivariable)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of determining global maxima for functions defined on non-compact sets, particularly in the context of a continuous function f: ℝ² → ℝ that is non-negative and approaches zero as r → ∞. The user presents a scenario where a stationary point at (1,0) has a function value of 4, raising questions about confirming this as a global maximum. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of restricting the domain to a compact set M to apply the extreme value theorem, as the epsilon-delta argument alone does not guarantee that the stationary point is indeed a global maximum. A theorem is introduced, showing that under certain conditions, a critical point can be confirmed as a global maximum, highlighting the importance of analyzing the function's behavior at infinity. The discussion concludes with an invitation for further exploration of cases where the maximum may not be at the critical point.
SweatingBear
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Been a while since I stopped by here...

There's one thing about optimization on non-compact sets that's been bugging me for quite a while and I'd love to hear how you perceive things.

Say we are optimizing a partially differentiable (and thus continuous) function $f:\mathbb{R^2} \to \mathbb{R}$ over entire $\mathbb{R}^2$. Suppose $f(x,y) \geqslant 0$ for all $(x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2$ and say at $(1,0)$ we have one stationary point where $f(1,0) = 4$. Furthermore, let's assume that $f(x,y) \to 0$ when $r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2} \to \infty$.

So we suspect $4$ is the global maximum of the function but how to be certain? Well by definition we have for the previously stated limit

$$\forall \epsilon, \exists \delta : r > \delta \implies |f(x,y)| < \epsilon $$

Especially for $\epsilon = 4$ we can say that there exists some $\delta_0$ such that

$$r > \delta_0 \implies |f(x,y)| < 4 $$

Assume now that $r_0 > \delta_0$ and let us study our function on the set $M = \{ (x,y) : x^2 + y^2 \leqslant r_0^2\}$. Since $M$ is compact and $f$ continuous on it, by extreme value theorem a maximum value must exist on it. Our epsilon-delta-statement tells us that on the boundary of $M$ and outside of it, $f(x,y)$ never equals $4$. So the only possible case left is that $f(x,y) = 4$ on an interior point of $M$

But how do we from here take the leap and argue that $f(x,y) = 4$ is necessarily a global maximum? I have trouble fully understanding why it really is necessary to restrict the domain into a compact region with some specific and fixed $r_0$; how is that really useful, I feel like it does not necessarily provide any further information? Does not the epsilon argument suffice by itself?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not true.

Keep things simpler by working in $\mathbb{R}$. Find an example of a diff $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ where $0$ is a critical point for $f$, and where $f\geq 0$, and where $f(x)\to 0$ as $|x|\to \infty$ but $0$ is not maximum point. Perhaps, you can visualize this function?

The following however is true.

Theorem: Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ be such that:
(i) $f$ is of class $\mathcal{C}^2$
(ii) $f(x)\to 0$ as $|x|\to \infty$
(iii) $0$ is the only critical point
(iv) $f''(0) < 0$
Then $0$ is a global maximum point for $f$.

Proof: By (iii) and (iv) $0$ is a local maximum for $f$. Let $a = f(0)$. Assume for the time being $a > 0$.

By (ii) there is an $r>0$ such that if $|x|\geq r$ then $|f(x)| < a$. Define $K$ to be the interval $[-r,r]$. On $K$ the function $f$ assumes a maximum value. The maximum value cannot be at the endpoints as $f(\pm r) < a$ and $f(0) = a$. By (iii) there is no critical point in $(-r,r)$ other than $0$ thus we conclude that $0$ is maximum point for $f$. Since $f(x)<a$ for all $|x|\geq r$ it means that $f(0) \geq f(x)$ for all $x\not \in K$ and for all $x\in K$ so that $0$ is a global maximum point for $f$.

I am too lazy to think about $a\leq 0$. Maybe you can continue from there?
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K