Optimizing Cost Integrals with Free Endpoint: Calculus of Variations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Kreizhn
Messages
714
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Optimize the following cost integral

[tex]x(1)^2 + \displaystyle \int_0^1 (x^2 + \dot{x}^2) dx[/tex]

subject to x(0) =1, x(1) is free


Homework Equations



Now our prof showed us a method of doing this. In general, if we want to minimize

[tex]f(b,x(b)) + \displaystyle \int_a^b L(t,x,\dot{x}) dx[/tex]
where x(b) is free, then we can change the problem to minimizing
[tex]\displaystyle \int_a^b L(t,x,\dot{x}) + \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} + \sum_i \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i} \dot{x}_i dx[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



Now we he goes through the example above, he changes the Lagrangian to

[tex]\displaystyle \int_0^1 \left[ 2x\dot{x} + (x^2 + \dot{x}^2) \right] dx[/tex]

My problem is that I don't see where [itex]2x\dot{x}[/itex] comes from. The only way this conforms to the above equation is if f has the form of the original Lagrangian. At least in this case, I figure that [itex]f(t,x(t)) = x(t)[/itex] in which case

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} + \sum_i \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i} \dot{x}_i = \dot{x} + \dot{x} = 2\dot{x}[/tex]

which varies from what he got by the factor of x
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If nothing else, can someone please confirm that if [itex]f(t,x(t)) = x(t)[/itex] then

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} + \sum_i \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i} \dot{x}_i = \dot{x} + \dot{x} = 2\dot{x}[/tex]
 
Nevermind, everything has been figured out. I knew it looked weird that I was getting a coefficient of 2. It turns out I didn't notice the fact that x(1) was actually x(1)², so no worries.