Optimizing Illumination: Placing an Object to Receive Least Illumination

  • Thread starter Thread starter suspenc3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optimization
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the optimal position for an object along a line between two light sources to minimize illumination. The illumination is described as being proportional to the strength of the light sources and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from each source. One source is three times stronger than the other, and they are positioned 10 feet apart.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting up the problem mathematically, including the formulation of an equation for illumination based on distance. There are attempts to derive a function for illumination and its derivative, with questions about eliminating variables and understanding the behavior of the function at minimum points.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their mathematical formulations and derivative findings. Some express uncertainty about visualizing the problem and the setup, while others provide graphical representations to aid understanding. There is no explicit consensus on the solution yet, but various approaches are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention difficulties in visualizing the problem and the need for diagrams. There is also a focus on the mathematical relationships involved and the implications of constants in the equations being discussed.

suspenc3
Messages
400
Reaction score
0
The Illumination of an object by a light source is directly proportional to the strength of the source and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source. If the two light sources, one three times as strong as the other, are placed 10ft apart, where should an object be placed on the line between the sources so as to receive the least illumination?

Im having trouble setting up the problem..any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are you intial thoughts?
 
I can't picture, or draw a diagram to illustrate the problem. I don't understand what the setup would look like.
 
[tex]I = \frac{S}{r^2} + \frac{3S}{(10-r)^2}[/tex]

Perhaps something like that?
 
Yes, that makes sence, but what can I use to eliminate one of the variables?
 
Before we proceed, it is probably more appropriate if we say that;

[tex]I\;\; \alpha \;\; \frac{S}{r^2} + \frac{3S}{(10-r)^2}[/tex]

As, S is constant, the only two variables are I and r. We want to know how I varies with respect to r, if I understant the problem correctly?

So how about finding [itex]I'(r)\;\;dr[/itex]?
 
ok well, I found I' but I think it is wrong. I get

[tex]I' = \frac{-10r^2}{r^4} - \frac{30(r^2-2r+100)}{(r^2-2^r+100)^2}[/tex]

When I try to solve for r I don't get a real number
 
I get

[tex]I'(r) = \frac{6S}{(10-r)^3} - \frac{2S}{r^3}[/tex]

You don't want to solve for I. What do you know about the gradient at a minimum point?
 
Last edited:
If you are having trouble visulaising the functions I have attached plot of them. The blue curve is that of the original function, the red is that of the derrivative. As S is constant(strength of source) I assigned an arbitray value of S=1 for this plot.

Hope this helps :smile:
 

Attachments

  • illumination.jpg
    illumination.jpg
    13.9 KB · Views: 473
  • #10
Hey Suspenc, did you ever figure out this problem. I am having trouble figuring it out myself and was wondering if you could assist.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K