Optimizing Illumination: Finding the Minimum Point Between Two Light Sources

  • Thread starter Thread starter Feodalherren
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on optimizing the illumination received by an object positioned between two light sources, where one source is three times stronger than the other and they are 10 feet apart. The illumination formula used is I = s / d², leading to the equation I = [S/x²] + [3S/(10-x)²]. Participants emphasize the importance of defining the distance as x for clarity and suggest using calculus to determine the value of x that minimizes I(x). The conversation highlights the need for proper variable naming and the application of derivatives in optimization problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically derivatives
  • Familiarity with the concept of inverse square law in illumination
  • Basic knowledge of optimization techniques
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the inverse square law in physics
  • Learn how to apply derivatives to find local minima and maxima
  • Explore optimization problems in calculus
  • Investigate the effects of varying light source strengths on illumination
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or mathematics, educators teaching optimization techniques, and anyone interested in the principles of illumination and calculus.

Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


The illumination of an object is directly proportional to to the strength of the source and inversely proportional to the distance squared. If two light sources, one three times stronger than the other, are placed 10 ft apart, where should and object be places on the line between the sources so as to receive the least illumination?

Homework Equations



-----

The Attempt at a Solution



I = s / d^2

[S/d^2] + [3S/(10-d) ^2] = I <-- minimize

I'm completely stuck here. Am I treating d as a constant and just doing d/dS or what?

Sorry that's confusing. I should call distance X instead. Am I taking the derivative with respect to distance was what I meant to ask.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Feodalherren said:

Homework Statement


The illumination of an object is directly proportional to to the strength of the source and inversely proportional to the distance squared. If two light sources, one three times stronger than the other, are placed 10 ft apart, where should and object be places on the line between the sources so as to receive the least illumination?

Homework Equations



-----

The Attempt at a Solution



I = s / d^2

[S/d^2] + [3S/(10-d) ^2] = I <-- minimize

I'm completely stuck here. Am I treating d as a constant and just doing d/dS or what?

Sorry that's confusing. I should call distance X instead. Am I taking the derivative with respect to distance was what I meant to ask.

Yes, it would be better to call the distance from one source ##x## and the other ##10-x## to not confuse it with the ##d## in derivatives. So you have ##I## as a function of ##x##. You have left out the constant of proportionality, which shouldn't matter anyway. So use calculus to find what value of ##x## gives the minimum value of ##I(x)##.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
82
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K