Optimizing Pedal Crank Forces for Efficient Cycling: A Square Wave Approach

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on optimizing pedal crank forces for efficient cycling using a square wave approach. Key insights reveal that the forces exerted by the rider on the pedal crank can be categorized into alternating and non-alternating forces, with the rider's weight and crank weight both contributing to the overall force dynamics. The pedal force is maximally effective at 90 degrees and 270 degrees, where it is tangent to the crank, while at other angles, only a component of the force contributes to torque. The conversation also highlights the potential for improved efficiency through a square wave mechanism in pedal force application.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pedal crank mechanics and cycling dynamics
  • Familiarity with force analysis in mechanical systems
  • Knowledge of torque generation and its relation to pedal angles
  • Basic principles of waveforms in mechanical applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Cyclists Pedal Thrust Calculator" for practical applications of pedal force analysis
  • Explore "square wave vs. sine wave" mechanics in cycling efficiency
  • Study "torque generation in pedal systems" to enhance understanding of force application
  • Investigate "fatigue analysis techniques" specific to cycling biomechanics
USEFUL FOR

Cyclists, mechanical engineers, sports scientists, and anyone interested in optimizing cycling performance through advanced force analysis techniques.

tmccraig
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am trying to determine the forces exerted on a bicycle pedal crank by the rider so I can analyze the fatigue. I believe that I understand how to conduct the fatigue analysis but I think that the forces on the bike crank are more complicated then I have assumed them to be so far.

I know that the forces from the rider will be treated as alternating forces, but am also trying to determine if non-alternating forces exist. I was thinking that the weight of the crank could be considered a non-alternating force.

So far I have broken up the force cycle into four parts to simplify the problem. I am considering the crank forces when the bike pedal is at the top (0 deg), when the pedal crank is parallel to the ground with the pedal near the front wheel (90 deg), when the pedal is at the bottom of the cycle nearest the ground (180 deg), and when the pedal crank is parallel to the ground again with the pedal near the rear wheel (270 deg). At 0 deg, I am assuming that there is a tensile force on the crank normal to the crank ends. At 90 deg and 270 deg, I am assuming that the tensile force is angled. And that the tensile force is normal to the crank ends at 180 deg. Any suggests on whether or not these assumptions are correct would be very helpful.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At 90 and 270 degrees, the force of that the rider is exerting onto the pedals is *tangent* to the crank.
 
tmccraig: The self weight of the crank is also an alternating force, because the gravitational force is directional. However, the crank self weight is probably negligible compared to the forces from the rider.
 
The only time during that 4-stroke pedal cycle that 100%(disregarding mech. loss) of the rider's effort(force applied to the pedals) is being directly converted into torque is at 90 degrees and 270 degrees. this is because it is only at these two points that the pedal force is directly tangent to the cranks. at any other point in the pedal stroke, only a *component* of the rider's pedal force is converted into torque.
 
Can I offer an improvement to the sine wave cycle of forces when pedalling? If the downward foot movement is connected to a vertical chain which runs on two small cogs (top and bottom) and then onto a large cog behind , then all the applied force is "tangential " and is much easier and more efficient. The basic shape to keep in your mind is a large cog running forward to the small top cog, then vertically down to a second small bottom cog and then back to the large cog.All that can be geared down for a bicycle or a generator. That would represent a square wave rather than a sine wave.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
15K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K