- 29,179
- 4,610
splitting white light, and turns out refraction is... complicated
The discussion revolves around the concept of prisms, particularly focusing on the complexities of refraction, the possibility of creating prisms with negative indices of refraction, and the quality of related illustrations. Participants explore various aspects of prisms, including their applications in experiments and their representation in popular culture.
Participants express multiple competing views regarding the creation of prisms with negative indices of refraction and the accuracy of illustrations. The discussion remains unresolved on these points.
Some claims rely on specific definitions and assumptions about optical principles, and there are unresolved mathematical steps related to the discussion of light dispersion and Kramers-Kronig relations.
Hornbein said:Would it be possible to make a prism with a negative index of refraction?
Used them - well, actually senses, but the same idea - in a freshman physics lab I taught. They are air filled, and you make the measurements in a water tank. Concave is focusing.Hornbein said:Would it be possible to make a prism with a negative index of refraction?
I read somewhere recently, that is the most widely recognized "logo" worldwide.Frabjous said:I think this is the most popular version![]()
gmax137 said:I read somewhere
I'm not sure I buy that. There's some stiff competition.gmax137 said:the most widely recognized "logo" worldwide.
I presume you meant lenses.Vanadium 50 said:Used them - well, actually senses, but the same idea - in a freshman physics lab I taught. They are air filled, and you make the measurements in a water tank. Concave is focusing.
Yes, thanks.hutchphd said:I presume you meant lenses.