Orbit eq. holds inside BH? - MTW sec. 25

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jorrie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the validity of orbital equations derived from MTW section 25 in the context of black holes, specifically whether these equations can be used to plot infalling orbits inside the event horizon. The scope includes theoretical exploration and mathematical reasoning related to general relativity and black hole physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an orbital equation and questions its applicability for plotting infalling orbits inside the black hole horizon, considering the behavior of the equations.
  • Another participant asserts that the equations are valid both inside and outside the horizon but questions the differentiation of the equation if the goal is integration, suggesting an alternative approach to solve for φ.
  • A different participant agrees with the validity of the equations and shares a preference for the second-order equation, citing experiences where the first equation led to orbits locking into specific points.
  • A participant provides a link to an external source claiming to offer the exact solution of the Schwarzschild orbital equation, mentioning a connection to modular forms.
  • Several participants inquire about the rate of perihelion advance for Kerr orbits, with references to specific literature that discusses this topic.
  • Another participant acknowledges the information provided about Kerr orbit perihelion advance and expresses interest in the referenced paper.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the orbital equations are valid inside and outside the horizon, but there is no consensus on the best method for integration or the implications of using different forms of the equations. The discussion on Kerr orbits introduces additional questions that remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the behavior of the equations inside the horizon and the specific conditions under which the equations are applied. The discussion also touches on the complexity of integrating the equations and the potential for different outcomes based on the chosen method.

Jorrie
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,255
Reaction score
143
MTW section 25, from eq. 25.16 onwards, derives an orbital equation (with G=c=1, u = M/r, E and L Schwarzschild constants for energy and angular momentum respectively):

[tex]\left(\frac{du}{d\phi}\right)^2 = \frac{M^2}{L^2}(E^2-1) + \frac{2M^2}{L^2}u - u^2 + 2u^3[/tex]

This equation is readily differentiable to give

[tex]\frac{d^2u}{d\phi^2}= \frac{M^2}{L^2} - u + 3u^2[/tex]

which is often used for numerical integration to obtain orbital plots of [itex]r[/itex] against [itex]\phi[/itex].

My question: since both equations seem to be well behaved for any [itex]u < \infty[/itex], can they be used to plot the 'infalling' orbit inside the horizon? Or are either E or L or both not valid there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, they're valid both inside and outside the horizon, but... why would you differentiate the equation if your purpose is to integrate it?? Calling the RHS of the first equation V(u), just solve for φ:

φ = ∫du/√V(u)

and evaluate this integral numerically.
 
Bill_K said:
Yes, they're valid both inside and outside the horizon, but... why would you differentiate the equation if your purpose is to integrate it??
Thanks Bill.

I think the second order equation is more 'integrator friendly' than the first one. I recall having had a few cases where the orbits 'locks' itself into either peri- or apo-apsis when trying the first one, while the second one seems to be immune from that.
 
Does anyone know the rate of perihelion advance for (equatorial, nearly circular) Kerr orbits?
 
Bill_K said:
Does anyone know the rate of perihelion advance for (equatorial, nearly circular) Kerr orbits?

Some information on Kerr orbit perihelion advance is given by Levin et. al in "A Periodic Table for Black Hole Orbits", Appendix A. It is essentially about finding the orbits that advance by rational multiples of ##2\pi##.
 
Jorrie said:
Some information on Kerr orbit perihelion advance is given by Levin et. al in "A Periodic Table for Black Hole Orbits", Appendix A. It is essentially about finding the orbits that advance by rational multiples of ##2\pi##.
Interesting paper, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
607
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K