Orbital period of eclipsing binaries

  • Thread starter Sastronaut
  • Start date
  • #1
68
0
based on the data in the table I want to calculate the orbital period of the eclipsing binary but I want to state my answer in equation form so that any observer can predict the times of future eclipses. Does anyone have an idea on how I go about doing that with the given data. I tried to find a standard equation that I can essentially plug my HJDs in to express the period of eclipsing binary. Any ideas would be great. thanks pf.
 

Attachments

Answers and Replies

  • #2
35,258
11,510
That doesn't look periodic, unless most (like >90%) eclipses are missing for some reason.

As type of the equation, you are probably looking for something like ##t=T_0 + kT## with an offset T0, a period T and an integer k (numbering the eclipses).
 
  • #3
68
0
the data I was given is ment to be practice for myself so that when I am presented with the full data I will be able to process it. could you show me how to plug my HJD into the equation? what does offset mean as far as my data goes? and if T stands for period what does "t" stand for?
 
  • #4
68
0
That doesn't look periodic, unless most (like >90%) eclipses are missing for some reason.

As type of the equation, you are probably looking for something like ##t=T_0 + kT## with an offset T0, a period T and an integer k (numbering the eclipses).
okay I read a some stuff online and I understand what you saying. the data I was given is spotty and that was intentional. how can I determine T if I do not know my K value given my offset value (To) equals my secondary minimum 48869.627?
 
  • #5
35,258
11,510
Calculate the time differences, look for something similar to a largest common divisor (not exact, but approximately).
Alternatively, try a Fourier transformation, it might give some interesting results.

If a period T fits, periods T/3, T/5 and so on fit as well - there is no way to resolve that ambiguity, but T is more likely (otherwise you have a very special set of observations).
 
  • #6
68
0
I never thought to use Fourier transformation for it....though to be honest that maybe over thinking the problem....I feel that the answer is in front of me I just cant figure it out. I calculated differences in HJDs to see what was the lowest value I could get from the difference moving down the list secondary minimum to secondary minimum. I determined that the lowest orbital period I could get with doing this is 40.913HJD which was calculated by subtracting (49899.744-49858.831)HJD. But I agree with you 100%. there is no way to resolve that ambiguity so im not sure how I will know that the period I calculated is the correct one, and not some multiple of the true period.
 

Related Threads on Orbital period of eclipsing binaries

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
731
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Top