Order Formula Under Second Isomorphism Theorem: Does it Hold?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the validity of the order formula |HK| = |H|*|K|/|H n K| under the conditions of the second isomorphism theorem. Participants explore whether this formula holds in general or under specific hypotheses, particularly in the context of finite groups.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the order formula applies when H and K are finite subgroups, indicating that normality is not required for the formula to hold.
  • Another participant notes that while HK may not be a subgroup without normality of H or K, this does not invalidate the order formula.
  • A detailed proof is provided by a participant, outlining the action of K on the cosets of H and deriving the order formula using concepts of orbits and stabilizers.
  • A later reply expresses appreciation for the proof shared, indicating engagement with the technical details presented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the order formula holds for finite subgroups without the need for normality, but there is discussion about the implications of HK not being a subgroup. The discussion remains open regarding the general applicability of the formula under lesser hypotheses.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the groups involved, particularly concerning normality and the nature of HK as a subgroup.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
In the conditions where the second isomorphism theorem applies, one has H/HnK = HK/K so in particular, taking orders (in the finite case), one has the order formula

|HK| = |H|*|K|/|H n K|.

Does anyone know if this formula holds in general, or under lesser hypotheses? Thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes! The formula applies in the case where H and K are finite subgroups. So no normality is required. Of course, the proof will be a lot different as you cannot use the first isomorphism theorem anymore...

Also, note that HK will not be a subgroup anymore! You'll need normality of H or K for this to be a subgroup. But that doesn't mean that the formula doesn't hold anymore...
 
Last edited:
For your convenience, I'll write the proof down:

Let [tex]X=\{Hg~\vert~g\in G\}[/tex]. Then K acts on X by multiplication (thus Hg=H.g). It follows that

[tex]HK=\{hk~\vert~h\in H, k\in K\}=\bigcup_{k\in K}{H\cdot k}[/tex]

and [tex]\{H\cdot k~\vert~k\in K\}[/tex] is the orbit of the element x:=H. Also, we have that the stabilizer [tex]K_x=K\cap H[/tex], thus there are [tex]|K|/|H\cap K|[/tex] elements in an orbit. Also, we have |H.k|=|H|. Thus

[tex]|HK|=|H||K|/|H\cap K|[/tex]
 
Oh. Very nice, thanks micromass!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K