Order of Automorphism and Abelian Groups

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RVP91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the order of the automorphism group of a group \( H \) and the property of \( H \) being Abelian. Participants explore various arguments and proofs to establish whether \( |Aut H| = 1 \) implies that \( H \) is Abelian, examining different approaches and reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if \( |Aut H| = 1 \), then \( H \) must be Abelian, but struggles to find a direct proof and considers properties of Abelian groups.
  • Another participant proposes a proof by contradiction, arguing that if \( H \) is not Abelian, then \( |Aut H| \) cannot equal 1, using the identity map and a specific mapping to illustrate this point.
  • A third participant offers a direct proof, stating that if \( |Aut(G)| = 1 \), then \( G/Z(G) \) must also equal 1, leading to the conclusion that \( Z(G) = G \).
  • Another contribution emphasizes that if \( |Aut(G)| = 1 \), then every inner automorphism is the identity, which implies commutativity for elements in \( G \).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple approaches to the problem, with some advocating for proof by contradiction while others suggest direct proofs. There is no consensus on a single method or conclusion, indicating ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Some arguments rely on specific properties of groups and automorphisms, and assumptions about the nature of \( H \) and its subgroups may not be fully explored or agreed upon.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying group theory, particularly in understanding the implications of automorphism groups and the properties of Abelian groups.

RVP91
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
If |Aut H| = 1 then how can I show H is Abelian? I've shown a mapping is an element of Aut H previously but didn't think that would help.

I have been looking through properties and theorems linked to Abelian groups but so far have had no luck finding anything that would help.

The closest I have is that it may have something to do with "any subgroup of an Abelian group is normal"

My line of argument was if |Aut G|=1 then Inn G = Aut G and so since Inn G is normal then G is normal?

However something tells me this is incorrect.

Thanks in advance for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is my revised argument.
To show |Aut H| = 1 implies H is Abelian, we can show H is not Abelian implies |Aut H| does not equal 1.
If H is not Abelian then, we know firstly the identity map is always an automorphism of H. Furthermore we know that the mapping A: H ---> H given by A(x) = (h^-1)xh (where h,(h^-1),x are in H and h and (h^-1) are fixed). This tells us that we have |Aut H| does not equal to one. If H had been Abelian then A(x) = (h^-1)xh = (h^-1)x = x and this is just the identity map again.
 
Your proof works, but try showing the result directly, i.e. without using contradiction.

Here's an even shorter proof. We know [itex]G/Z(G) \cong \text{Inn}(G) \subseteq \text{Aut}(G)[/itex]. So if |Aut(G)|=1, then |G/Z(G)| = 1, implying Z(G)=G.
 
along the same lines:

if |Aut(G)| = 1, then every inner automorphism is the identity.

this means that for every x and g in G:

gxg^-1 = x, so

gx = xg.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K