Order of Elements: Non-Abelian Group G & Correlation between |a|, |b|, |ab|?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bachelier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the correlation between the orders of elements in a non-abelian group G, specifically focusing on elements a and b with orders |a|= n and |b|= m, and the order of their product |ab|. Participants explore theoretical implications and specific examples, including the dihedral group D9 and its Sylow 2-subgroups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that there is generally no correlation between the orders of a, b, and |ab|, noting that |ab| may not even be finite.
  • One example provided involves a group where both a and b have order 2, yet |ab| is not finite, illustrating the complexity of the relationship.
  • A participant inquires about determining the order of elements in the dihedral group D9, specifically regarding the identification of elements with order 2 for Sylow 2-subgroups.
  • Another participant suggests that elements multiplied by b^2=e have order 2, indicating a conceptual approach to understanding element orders in the group.
  • Discussion includes a detailed examination of the structure of Dn, particularly how the parity of n affects the orders of elements and the number of Sylow 2-subgroups.
  • Mathematical reasoning is presented to show that every reflection in D9 has order 2, with a proof involving the group’s defining relations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there is no straightforward correlation between the orders of elements a and b and the order of their product |ab|. However, the discussion includes multiple competing views on how to approach the problem of determining element orders, particularly in the context of specific groups like D9.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the relationships between element orders, particularly in non-abelian groups, and the dependence on specific group structures and definitions. The complexity of Sylow subgroups in relation to the parity of n is also noted.

Bachelier
Messages
375
Reaction score
0
If a group G is non abelian and a and b in G have orders |a|= n and |b|= m, is there a correlation we can draw between m and n and |ab|?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in general, no. it may be that |ab| isn't even finite.

for example, if G is the quotient of the free group on two generators defined by:

a2 = b2 = e

then ab is not of finite order, even though both a and b are of order 2.
 
Deveno said:
in general, no. it may be that |ab| isn't even finite.

for example, if G is the quotient of the free group on two generators defined by:

a2 = b2 = e

then ab is not of finite order, even though both a and b are of order 2.

Thanks. That's what I thought.

So How do I go about figuring out the order of different elements in a group. For instance, consider Dihedral D9 then I can define as : {a,b| |a|=9 and |b|=2}

Now if I'm trying to figure out the different Sylow 2-subgroups, I need to get the elements with order 2. How do I do it?
 
I guess in this case everything that is multiplied by b^2=e has order 2, it seems like I should treat e as zero under the multiplication rule.
 
Bachelier said:
Thanks. That's what I thought.

So How do I go about figuring out the order of different elements in a group. For instance, consider Dihedral D9 then I can define as : {a,b| |a|=9 and |b|=2}

Now if I'm trying to figure out the different Sylow 2-subgroups, I need to get the elements with order 2. How do I do it?

for the dihedral group Dn, the elements of order 2 depend on whether or not n is even.

if n is odd, then the sylow 2-subgroups are all of order 2, because half the elements are of odd order (the rotations). geometrically, it's obvious the reflections are of order 2, but we can prove this algebraically, as well:

given: rn = 1, s2 = 1, and rs = sr-1, let's calculate (srk)2.

first, a small detour:

lemma: rs = sr-1 → rks = sr-k.


for k = 1, this is given by the defining relations on Dn.

suppose this is true for k = m.

then rm+1s = r(rms) = r(sr-m) = (rs)r-m
= (sr-1)r-m = sr-(m+1),

so the general result holds by induction on k.

corollary: srk = r-ks

since r-k = rn-k,

we have rn-ks = srk-n, so rnr-ks = srkr-n, so the result follows, because both rn and r-n are the identity.

ok, back to showing what the square of a reflection is:

(srk)2 = (srk)(srk)

= (r-ks)(srk) = r-k(ss)rk

= r-krk = 1.

so every reflection has order 2. now, since 9 is odd, this means we have 9 sylow 2-subgroups, one for each reflection.

(if n is even, we have a slightly more involved situation, because now 4 divides the order of the group).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K