MHB Order of Ops: PEMDAS Explained w/ Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marvin Kalngan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operations
Marvin Kalngan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The Order of Operations: PEMDAS
“A common technique for remembering the order of operations is the abbreviation "PEMDAS", which is turned into the phrase "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally". It stands for "Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, and Addition and Subtraction". This tells you the ranks of the operations: Parentheses outrank exponents, which outrank multiplication and division (but multiplication and division are at the same rank), and these two outrank addition and subtraction (which are together on the bottom rank). When you have a bunch of operations of the same rank, you just operate from left to right. For instance, 15 ÷ 3 × 4 is not 15 ÷ 12, but is rather 5 × 4, because, going from left to right, you get to the division first.”

But according to my book, 6(3) means “6 times 3”.
So,
16/4(4) = ? is the same with 16/4*4 = ?
because
4(4) means “4 times 4”
and
4*4 means “4 times 4”

It was not stated if P in PEMDAS stands for P as a sign of grouping or P as a sign of multiplication.

Sources:
The Order of Operations: PEMDAS
College Algebra by William Hart 4th edition, page 5
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Marvin Kalngan said:
The Order of Operations: PEMDAS
“A common technique for remembering the order of operations is the abbreviation "PEMDAS", which is turned into the phrase "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally". It stands for "Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, and Addition and Subtraction". This tells you the ranks of the operations: Parentheses outrank exponents, which outrank multiplication and division (but multiplication and division are at the same rank), and these two outrank addition and subtraction (which are together on the bottom rank). When you have a bunch of operations of the same rank, you just operate from left to right. For instance, 15 ÷ 3 × 4 is not 15 ÷ 12, but is rather 5 × 4, because, going from left to right, you get to the division first.”

But according to my book, 6(3) means “6 times 3”.
So,
16/4(4) = ? is the same with 16/4*4 = ?
because
4(4) means “4 times 4”
and
4*4 means “4 times 4”

It was not stated if P in PEMDAS stands for P as a sign of grouping or P as a sign of multiplication.

Sources:
The Order of Operations: PEMDAS
College Algebra by William Hart 4th edition, page 5

Hi Marvin! :)

That is correct.
6(3) is shorthand for $6 \times (3)$.

So:
$16/4(4) = 16 / 4 \times (4) = 4 \times 4 = 16$

And P in PEMDAS stands for Parentheses, which groups an expression.
The operation applied to it can be anything.
If no operation is specified, than multiplication is intended.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top