Ordering on the Set of Real Numbers .... Sohrab, Exercise 2.1.10 (c) ....

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Exercise 2.1.10 Part (c) from Houshang H. Sohrab's "Basic Real Analysis," focusing on the properties of real numbers and their ordering. Participants seek clarification on assumptions regarding the natural numbers, integers, and rationals as they relate to the exercise, and explore proof techniques, particularly induction.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Peter expresses uncertainty about the assumptions regarding the sets $$\mathbb{N}, \mathbb{N_0}, \mathbb{Z},$$ and $$\mathbb{Q}$$ as defined by Sohrab, noting that they are mentioned without detailed construction.
  • Peter proposes to prove the exercise using the real numbers defined as an ordered field and mentions the potential usefulness of properties from previous exercises.
  • Hints are provided by participants suggesting the use of proof by induction and referencing part (b) of the exercise as a starting point.
  • Peter shares an attempt at a proof, indicating that he believes the statement $$n \in \mathbb{N} \Longrightarrow n \gt 0$$ holds true for all natural numbers, using induction.
  • A later reply confirms Peter's reasoning as correct.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is a partial agreement on the approach to the exercise, particularly regarding the use of induction. However, uncertainty remains about the foundational assumptions regarding the sets involved, and no consensus is reached on these assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the definitions provided by Sohrab, particularly concerning the lack of detailed construction for the sets mentioned, which may affect their understanding and approach to the exercise.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Houshang H. Sohrab's book: "Basic Real Analysis" (Second Edition).

I am focused on Chapter 2: Sequences and Series of Real Numbers ... ...

I need help with Exercise 2.1.10 Part (c) ... ...

Exercise 2.1.10 Part (c) reads as follows:View attachment 7216I am unable to make a meaningful start on Exercise 2.1.10 (c) ... can someone please help ...

PeterNOTE 1: I am not sure what assumptions Sohrab wants us to make about $$\mathbb{N}, \mathbb{N_0}, \mathbb{Z}$$ and $$\mathbb{Q}$$ for these exercises ... he has not developed/constructed the natural numbers, the integers or the rationals ... but simply named them as sets and done little more than indicate notation for them ... as follows:View attachment 7217
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/7218So I am trying to prove the exercise using the real numbers as defined by an ordered field (which, I think, can be shown to contain a copy of each of the sets $$\mathbb{N}, \mathbb{N_0}, \mathbb{Z}$$ and $$\mathbb{Q}$$ ... )

Mind you ... after reading the start of Sohrab's Appendix A I am again a little uncertain as to what to assume when I read the following ... (mind you, this is stated well after the section where Exercise 2.1.10 (b) appears ... )View attachment 7219I would, however like, as I have previously indicated, to prove the exercise using the real numbers as defined by an ordered field ...

NOTE 2: Sohrab defines $$ \mathbb{R} $$ as a field with binary operations of addition and multiplication ... he then goes on to define subtraction, division and exponentiation as follows:View attachment 7220Sohrab's definition of the usual ordering on $$\mathbb{R}$$ plus some of the properties following are as follows ...View attachment 7221
View attachment 7222Hope someone can help ...

Peter*** EDIT *** I am concerned that Exercises 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 contain properties of addition, multiplication and inverses that flow directly form the properties of $$\mathbb{R}$$ as a field, ... ... and these properties could possibly be useful in the exercise ... so I am providing Sohrab's description of the field of real numbers and the exercises that follow it, namely Exercises 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 ... View attachment 7223
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/7224
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Proof by induction and part (b) of the exercise.
 
Euge said:
Hint: Proof by induction and part (b) of the exercise.
Thanks for the help, Euge ...

An attempt to follow your advice follows ...To show that $$n \in \mathbb{N} \Longrightarrow n \gt 0$$ ... ... ... ... (1)Now ... the above statement (1) is true for $$n = 1$$ by Exercise 2.1.10 (b)

Suppose now that it is true for some $$k \in \mathbb{N}$$...

Then $$k \in P$$ ...

... but we have $$1 \in P$$

Therefore $$k + 1 \in P$$ ... ... ... by Order Axiom $$O_1$$

Therefore (1) is true for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$...Is that correct?

Peter
 
Peter said:
Thanks for the help, Euge ...

An attempt to follow your advice follows ...To show that $$n \in \mathbb{N} \Longrightarrow n \gt 0$$ ... ... ... ... (1)Now ... the above statement (1) is true for $$n = 1$$ by Exercise 2.1.10 (b)

Suppose now that it is true for some $$k \in \mathbb{N}$$...

Then $$k \in P$$ ...

... but we have $$1 \in P$$

Therefore $$k + 1 \in P$$ ... ... ... by Order Axiom $$O_1$$

Therefore (1) is true for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$...Is that correct?

Peter

Yes it is
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K