Oriented Surfaces & Surface Area: Investigating the Impact

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of oriented surfaces and their impact on surface area, particularly in the context of spheres. Participants explore the implications of treating the radius of a sphere as a vector and whether this orientation affects the notion of surface area. The conversation touches on definitions, conventions, and mathematical interpretations related to area.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if the radius of a sphere is treated as a vector, the orientation could influence the concept of surface area, questioning if it makes sense to assign positive or negative values to surface area based on direction.
  • Another participant asserts that for any closed surface, the outward normal vector is conventionally considered positive, suggesting that this is an arbitrary but accepted convention.
  • A different viewpoint states that area is, by definition, positive, but introduces the idea of "signed area" without resolving the implications of this concept in the context of oriented surfaces.
  • One participant clarifies that area is a scalar value and that calculating it from a vector requires taking the magnitude, which does not depend on direction.
  • Another participant mentions that in optics, the radius of curvature can have a signed value based on the focal point, indicating that context may influence how these concepts are applied.
  • Discussion also includes the notion of "vector area" in relation to flow through a surface, suggesting that while direction may be described as negative, area itself remains non-negative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether surface area can be considered negative based on orientation. While some assert that area is inherently positive, others introduce the concept of signed area, leading to an unresolved debate on the implications of orientation in this context.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in definitions and conventions regarding area and orientation, with participants not reaching a consensus on the implications of treating surface area as signed or unsigned.

Trysse
Messages
75
Reaction score
16
TL;DR
I have the following question: Does it make a difference for the surface area of a sphere if the sphere is inward- and outward-oriented?
I usually think of a sphere as the set of all points ##P_x##, that have the identical distance r to some point ##C## which is the center of the sphere. I calculate the surface area ##A## of the sphere as
$$A=4 \pi (C P_x)^2$$
However, what happens if I think of the distance between the points C and Px not just as a distance but as a vector? If I think of the radius of the sphere as a vector, this vector can either point from the surface of the sphere to the center or from the center to the surface
$$ \vec {CP_x} = \vec{r} = \vec{-r} = \vec{P_x C} $$

Does the direction of the radius (i.e. the orientation of the surface) have an influence on the concept of surface area? I was wondering if it makes sense to say:
$$ A=4π \vec{CP_x}^2=−4π \vec{P_xC}^2 $$

I have done a quick search on Google. However, from what I have found, I got the impression, that the surface area is not really an issue that is considered in the context of oriented surfaces. Or did I just search for the wrong keywords?

https://www.google.com/search?q=ori...rome..69i57.6231j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

1671457084082.png

Could I say that the red sphere has a negative surface area while the green sphere has a positive surface area?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not to me.
In my world, for any closed surface, the outward normal vector is positive.
This is of course an arbitrary, but adherent, convention.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Trysse
Trysse said:
P.S: I am unable to make the formula display properly. Can someone help?
Now fixed. There were a couple inconsistencies with left braces not having a matching right brace; i.e., { with ) and { with ].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd, Trysse and PeroK
Area is a scalar value. When you calculate it starting with a vector, you will have to take the magnitude of the vector to create a scalar result. The magnitude of the radius vector doesn't depend on it's direction.

Note that sometimes vectors are used to describe an "area" with the magnitude describing the area and the direction normal to the surface. Like the cross product of vectors, for example. It still doesn't have negative area, but in vector math you might describe the direction as negative, I guess.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Trysse
Also in optics the radius of curvature is often given a signed value depending upon the focal point.
And the "vector Area" is useful when talking about flow ("flux") through a surface unambiguously.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Trysse

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K