How can I convince myself of the following statement:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If x^{2}<0, there exists L orthochronous Lorentz tranformation such that:

Lx = -x

My concern is this:

If for example, we take x^{µ}=(1,0,0,0), then Lx in component form is:

Λ^{µ}_{β}x^{β}=Λ^{µ}_{0}x^{0}

=(Λ^{0}_{0}, Λ^{1}_{0}, Λ^{2}_{0}, Λ^{3}_{0}).

By definition, if it is anorthochronousLT, we must have Λ^{0}_{0}≥1 so it is clear that the statement above is false for this example (as the RHS in the case of our example vector, can't be positive).

Can anyone think of an example x^{µ}that would actually satisfy the condition Lx = -x?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Orthochronous Lorentz Transformations

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**