Orthogonality of Hermite functions

Click For Summary
Hermite functions, defined by the expression involving derivatives of the Gaussian function, are shown to form an orthogonal system, with the integral of their product yielding zero for different indices. Users discuss methods to prove this orthogonality, including integration by parts and the application of Sturm-Liouville theory. The integral involving Hermite polynomials is noted to equal a specific expression that confirms orthogonality. Some participants express unfamiliarity with certain mathematical concepts, while others suggest reading relevant literature for deeper understanding. The conversation highlights the collaborative effort to clarify the proof of orthogonality for Hermite functions.
DavideGenoa
Messages
151
Reaction score
5
Hi, friends! I want to show that Hermite functions, defined by ##\varphi_n(x)=(-1)^n e^{x^2/2}\frac{d^n e^{-x^2}}{dx^n}##, ##n\in\mathbb{N}## are an orthogonal system, i.e. that, for any ##m\ne n##,

##\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{x^2} \frac{d^m e^{-x^2}}{dx^m} \frac{d^n e^{-x^2}}{dx^n}=0 ##​

I have tried by integrating by parts, but I am landing nowhere...
Thank you so much for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try induction?
 
  • Like
Likes DavideGenoa
You can use the generating function and reduce the whole integral to a doable one.
 
  • Like
Likes DavideGenoa
I note that \int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n(x)\phi_m(x)\,dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-x^2}H_n(x)H_m(x)\,dx = 2\sqrt{\pi}n!\delta_{nm}. The second equality can be established by applying Sturm-Liouville theory to the Hermite equation H_n'' - 2xH_n' = -2nH_n.
 
  • Like
Likes DavideGenoa
Thank you all so much!
@dextercioby and pasmith: Regrettably, I do not know anything of Sturm-Liouville theory or generating functions...
@mfb: I am not sure how we could use induction with ##m## and ##n##... I think that integration by parts is the key, but I am not able to manipulate the integral to get the desired result...
 
The best way is the one suggested by pasmith because you won't do any integration.
So I suggest you read Sturm-Liouville theory chapter of Mathematical methods for physicists by Arfken.
 
  • Like
Likes DavideGenoa
pasmith said:
I note that \int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n(x)\phi_m(x)\,dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-x^2}H_n(x)H_m(x)\,dx = 2\sqrt{\pi}n!\delta_{nm}. The second equality can be established by applying Sturm-Liouville theory to the Hermite equation H_n'' - 2xH_n' = -2nH_n.

Or, since \phi_n = e^{-\frac12x^2}H_n, substitution yields <br /> \phi_n&#039;&#039; + (1 - x^2)\phi_n = -2n\phi_n. Multiplying by \phi_m and integrating over the real line gives <br /> \int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n&#039;&#039;\phi_m + (1 - x^2)\phi_n\phi_m\,dx = -2n\int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n \phi_m\,dx.<br /> Integrating the first term on the left by parts twice yields <br /> \int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n \phi_m&#039;&#039; + (1 - x^2)\phi_n\phi_m\,dx = -2n\int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n \phi_m\,dx<br /> and since \phi_m&#039;&#039; + (1-x^2)\phi_m = -2m\phi_m we have <br /> -2m \int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n \phi_m\,dx = -2n\int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n \phi_m\,dx or
2(n - m)\int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n \phi_m\,dx = 0.
 
  • Like
Likes Quantumjump, DavideGenoa, ShayanJ and 1 other person
DavideGenoa said:
@mfb: I am not sure how we could use induction with ##m## and ##n##... I think that integration by parts is the key, but I am not able to manipulate the integral to get the desired result...
It was a guess, as those things easily transform to n+-1 or m+-1 and so on via partial integration. We have much nicer solutions here now.
 
  • Like
Likes DavideGenoa
I thank you all very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K