Orthonormal Bases: Determining Coefficients for Arbitrary Vector

Click For Summary
An orthonormal basis allows any vector v in a vector space V to be expressed as a linear combination of basis elements using inner products. The coefficients are derived from the inner product of the vector with each basis element, which geometrically represents the projection of v onto the basis vectors. This method is validated through the properties of linear operators, where defining a linear operator A shows that it acts as the identity operator on the basis vectors. The discussion highlights the effectiveness of this approach in various mathematical results, including the Gram-Schmidt process. Understanding the geometric interpretation of these coefficients enhances comprehension of their significance in vector representation.
mrxtothaz
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
If we have a vector that can be expressed in terms of some finite list of basis elements. If we have an orthonormal basis for a vector space V, then a vector v can be expressed as <v,e1>e1 +...+ <v,en>en. This appears to be widely used for many results (such as Gram-Schmidt), but the motivation for this is not clear to me. Not only that, I don't understand why this is the case (geometrically).

Obtaining the coefficients for a given vector (in terms of an orthonormal basis) using the inner product of the vector v with each basis element... why does this work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you consider the version of the dot product involving cosine, v\cdot e_{1}=|v||e_{1}|cos\theta=|v|cos\theta because e_{1} is a unit vector. This is just the "e_1 component" of v (rather than the x or y component of v).
I included a poorly done illustration in Paint.
 

Attachments

  • Orthonormal Basis.JPG
    Orthonormal Basis.JPG
    18.2 KB · Views: 611
It works because it works on basis vectors. Define the linear operator A by
Av = \sum_{i=1}^n \langle v, e_i \rangle e_i.
Then for any k,
Ae_k = \sum_{i=1}^n \langle e_k, e_i \rangle e_i<br /> = \sum_{i=1}^n \delta_{ki} e_i = e_k.
It follows that A = I, so Av = v for any v.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K