Oscillating dipoles, energy and brightness

milkism
Messages
118
Reaction score
15
Homework Statement
Brightness as function of time.
Relevant Equations
See solution.
Problem:
1684351520772.png

Attempt at solution:
So "energy passing through per unit area per unit time" is equal to $$I = \frac{E_i}{A t}$$
So for a the graph will be in the form of ##y=1/x##?
For b) do we have to solve the differential equation $$dI = \frac{E_i}{A dt}$$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
milkism said:
Attempt at solution:
So "energy passing through per unit area per unit time" is equal to $$I = \frac{E_i}{A t}$$
##E_i## is not the energy that should appear in the above formula. The intensity of radiation ##I## at some point of space is the flux of radiation energy at that point. But ##E_i## is not radiation energy. ##E_i## is defined in the problem as the internal energy of the ##i##th oscillator.

For this problem, use the hint that the brightness is proportional to the total power radiated by the oscillators.

Note that as a dipole radiates, the internal energy ##E_i## of the dipole is converted into radiation energy. Assume that the internal energy of the dipole is not being replenished. So, the internal energy of the dipole will decrease over time.

Try to discover the differential equation that describes the rate of loss of internal energy of a dipole. I believe you will need to know the formula for the power radiated by an oscillating electric dipole in terms of its angular frequency ##\omega## and its dipole moment ##p##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top