Oscillation with friction - Analytical mechanics

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around analyzing a damped harmonic oscillator described by the equation m ddot{x} + alpha dot{x} = -kappa x, with a specific condition on the friction parameter. The proposed solution involves expressing the general solution as x(t) = e^(-alpha t / 2m)[A t + B], with constants A and B defined by initial conditions. Feedback suggests verifying the solution by substituting it back into the original equation, indicating that the provided solution may not correctly represent a damped oscillator due to the absence of oscillatory terms. The conversation highlights the critical damping case as a key aspect of the analysis. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of validating solutions in analytical mechanics.
NODARman
Messages
57
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
Hi, I had those exercises and want to know if they're correct. Also, feedback/tips would be great from you, professionals.

$$A$$

1. Let's consider the oscillator with a friction parameter...

\begin{equation}
m \ddot{x}+\alpha \dot{x}=-\kappa x
\end{equation}
but with
\begin{equation}
\alpha^2=4 m \kappa
\end{equation}
and after inserting, show that the general solution will be like this:
\begin{equation}
x(t)=\mathrm{e}^{-\alpha t / 2 m}[\mathcal{A} t+\mathcal{B}]
\end{equation}
Express A and B constants with the initial coordinates and velocity and analyze.

My solution:\begin{aligned}
&m\ddot{x} + \dot{x}\sqrt{4mk} +kx=0\\
&x(t)=e^{-\frac{\alpha t}{2m}}[\mathcal {A}t+\mathcal{B}]\\
&\\
&\dot{x}(t)=-\frac{\alpha}{2m} e^{-\frac{\alpha t}{2m}} [\mathcal {A}t+\mathcal{B}]+e^{-\frac{\alpha t}{2m}}\mathcal{A}\\
&\ddot{x}(t)=-\frac{4\mathcal{A}\alpha m-\mathcal{A}{\alpha^{2}}t-\mathcal{B}{\alpha^{2}}}{4m^2}e^{-\frac{\alpha t}{2m}}\\
&\\
&x(0)=\mathcal{B}\equiv x_0 \\
&\dot{x}(0)=-\frac{\alpha}{2m} \mathcal{B}+\mathcal{A} = -\frac{\alpha}{2m} x_0 +\mathcal{A} \\
&\\
&\mathcal{A} = \dot{x}_0 + \frac{\alpha}{2m} x_0\\
&\\
&x(t)=e^{-\frac{\alpha t}{2m}}[\dot{x}_0 + \frac{\alpha}{2m} x_0 t+x_0] = e^{-\frac{\alpha t}{2m}}\left[\dot{x}_0 + \left(\frac{\alpha}{2m} t+1\right)x_0\right]\\
\end{aligned}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
NODARman said:
Homework Statement: .
Relevant Equations: .

##\dots## and want to know if they're correct.
How about substituting your solution back in the original equation? That's the first thing I would do to verify my solution. Needless to say this doesn't look right because you have a damped harmonic oscillator with no oscillatory term(s) in the equation.
 
kuruman said:
Needless to say this doesn't look right because you have a damped harmonic oscillator with no oscillatory term(s) in the equation.
It should turn out to be the critical damping case.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
870
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
745
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K