Oscillator Differentials: What's a physical meaning of complex part of the solution for coordinate change of the anharmonic oscillator?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the complex part of the solution for coordinate changes in anharmonic oscillators, with participants seeking clarity on its physical meaning. One user expresses confusion about the original question and notes that the linked answer does not adequately address the complex solution or anharmonicity. Another user describes how mapping the state onto the complex plane results in a helical graph that tapers exponentially for unforced oscillators. There is a repeated request for a detailed explanation of the mathematical equations involved. The conversation highlights a need for clearer communication and understanding of the complex dynamics of oscillators.
DifferentialGalois
Messages
68
Reaction score
25
Homework Statement
What's a physical meaning of, for example, complex part of the solution for coordinate change of the anharmonic oscillator?
Why after substitute (for diff. equation solve) for real x we can earn ##x = Re(z) + iIm(z)##? Is it because of substitutio?
Relevant Equations
##x = Re(z) + iIm(z)##
##x(t)=e^{i\alpha t}##
##x(t) = A e^{i \alpha_1 t} + B e^{i \alpha_2 t}##
I don't understand what the question means, and the answer is provided here: https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/35821/222321
Could someone provide a comprehensive one-by-one explanation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The discussion at that link does not, as far as I can see, provide a physical meaning to the complex solution. Neither does it address anharmonicity, so I assume you mean just a standard damped (maybe forced) oscillator.
If we map the state onto the complex plane, the graph as a function of time (an axis normal to that plane) becomes a helix, tapering exponentially in the case of unforced. I would think this could be realised in a physical system.
 
bump
 
DifferentialGalois said:
bump
Why are you bumping your thread and not replying to @haruspex ?
 
berkeman said:
Why are you bumping your thread and not replying to @haruspex ?
i need an explanation to the mathematical equations.
 
DifferentialGalois said:
i need an explanation to the mathematical equations.
I thought I saw a pretty good explanation in the post by @haruspex -- Which part of what he wrote did you not understand?
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
891
Replies
2
Views
859
Replies
7
Views
974
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
945
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K