Oscilloscope trigger timing issue?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bmxicle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscilloscope
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a timing issue experienced while using an oscilloscope to measure a ramp waveform generated by an arbitrary waveform generator (AWG). Participants explore potential causes of variability in the timing relationship between the trigger marker and the ramp waveform, considering both the waveform generator and the oscilloscope's performance.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the setup involving a 1 MHz ramp waveform and a trigger marker, noting a significant variability (up to 15ns) in the timing between the marker and the ramp.
  • Another participant suggests that trigger jitter on a 2 GS/s oscilloscope should be in the tens of picoseconds and questions the use of BNC connections and terminations.
  • A participant mentions using coaxial/SMA connectors and plans to test with a square wave to assess signal integrity and timing relationships.
  • One participant provides troubleshooting steps, including checking for high-frequency filters, changing trigger polarity, adjusting trigger thresholds, and verifying the trigger output specifications of the generator.
  • Another participant shares a personal experience where electromagnetic interference from a power supply affected oscilloscope performance, suggesting physical separation as a potential solution.
  • A later reply proposes a method to stabilize the oscilloscope's timing by using a tee connection to manage the signal paths more effectively.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the source of the timing issue, with some suggesting it may be related to the oscilloscope while others point to the waveform generator. Multiple competing views on troubleshooting methods and potential causes remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the specifications of the trigger output from the generator and the impact of physical setup on oscilloscope performance. There are unresolved questions about the influence of various settings and configurations on the observed timing variability.

bmxicle
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I'm using an arbitrary waveform generator that is generating a 1 MHz ramp waveform. I'm triggering on a marker sent out by the waveform generator which is tied to the same memory location as the start of the waveform. So although there is supposed to be a small latency (1-3ns) between the marker and the waveform it should be roughly fixed in relation to the start of the ramp.

I'm measuring this output on a 2 GS/s oscilloscope with a 200 MHz bandwidth, but when I trigger on the marker it seems that the spacing between the marker and the ramp can vary as much as 15ns, so when captured by the trigger the waveform continually shakes around on the order of that magnitude. The marker has a fall time of less than the min resolution of the oscilloscope which is 2.5ns. I have the input to the oscilloscope (1 M ohm input impedance) connected in parallel with a 50 ohm termination because the waveform generator is 50 ohm back terminated.

What I'm unsure of is whether this shaking/poor timing is coming from the waveform generator itself or from the oscilloscope's inability to trigger properly. Since the AWG can produce much higher frequency waveforms I suspect it is the oscilloscope but I can't come up with a reason why. Any ideas or suggested reading would be appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Trigger jitter on a decent 2 GS/s scope should be in the 10s of ps. Are you using BNC connections between waveform gen and scope? BNC 50 ohm feedthrough termination?
Why not try outputting a square wave instead of a ramp so that you can see signal integrity and timing relationship of both signals.
 
I'm using coaxial/sma connectors and the terminations are coaxial terminations. I'll check out a square wave tomorrow but if jumping due to the trigger is only supposed to be around 10 ps then it seems like it probably is the waveform generator. Which at least narrows it down. There are some software settings that I can adjust so I'll probably try to fiddle with those too.
 
I want to confirm that all you are doing is connect two output directly from the generator to the scope and you already see the problem. One of the input to the scope trigger is the pulse associate to the start of the ramp. The second output is the ramp.

If that is the case.
1) Make sure you don't have a high frequency filter on the scope trigger.
2) Change the polarity of the trigger and see whether you solve the problem. You did not mention which edge is the reference edge of the generator, the pulse width of the trigger pulse might not be constant and if you trigger on the wrong edge, you will have problem.
3) You try adjusting the trigger threshold to see whether you can stablize the ramp?
4) You sure the trigger output of the generator is specified to drive 50ohm? Try take off the 50ohm if all else fail.

If your setup is directly from the generator to the scope alone, I cannot imagine any other problem.
 
I've adjusted probably every setting on my oscilloscope and triggered on rising and falling edges and I have also tried it with the 50 ohm terminations removed. Also it is just a simple sma connection from the waveform generator to the oscilloscope with the terminations connected with a bnc T-connector at the oscilloscope. So I'll probably email the company to see what can be done.
 
I had this problem with a 200 MHz oscilloscope which was placed on top of a power supply.

Because both devices had plastic boxes, the magnetic field from the power supply transformer was affecting the oscilloscope trace.

Just moving them apart fixed the problem.
 
If you have some extra long BNC, you might try placing a tee at the generator, run a short patch from that to the trigger (with 50ohms term at the scope), then run a longer patch from the tee to a scope input (again with a 50 ohm term at the scope). If the scope is stable, this should give you a rock-steady delay.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K