Out of 2 oscillators, which one decays to .1A first?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cdot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillators
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves comparing the decay rates of two oscillators: one experiencing viscous damping on a frictionless surface and the other subject to kinetic friction without viscous damping. Both oscillators are initially displaced from equilibrium and released, with the goal of determining which one reaches 1/10 of its initial amplitude first.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the decay envelope function and the relationship between damping coefficients. There is an exploration of comparing the magnitudes of the damping rates and the forces acting on each oscillator throughout their motion.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest focusing on comparing the decay rates rather than solving for them explicitly. Others analyze the behavior of the forces at different points in the oscillation, noting that the drag force varies while the frictional force remains constant. The discussion reflects a productive exploration of the underlying physics without reaching a consensus on the final outcome.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the implications of the question and the relevance of their analyses to the specific inquiry. There is a recognition of the time spent on the problem and its perceived complexity.

cdot
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider 2 oscillators (mass attached to spring on surface). For one oscillator, the surface is frictionless, but there is viscous damping (f=-bv). For the other, the surface has coefficient of kinetic friction uk, but there is no viscous damping. The masses are both pulled away from the equilibrium the same distance then released. When they first reach the equilibrium position, the magnitude of the viscous damping force for the first oscillator is equal to the magnitude of the frictional force for the second oscillator. which oscillator damps down to 1/10 the initial amplitude more quickly?

Homework Equations



F=-bv (viscous damping at slow speeds)
F=uk×N=uk×mg (force of friction)
x=Ae^(-σt)cos(ωt+∅)

The Attempt at a Solution



The decaying envelope function e^(-σt) determines the degree of damping. The term Ae^(-σt) acts as a varying amplitude. I defined Ae^(-σt) to be the amplitude of the oscillator subject to viscous damping and Ae^(-βt) to be the amplitude of the oscillator with no viscous damping. By setting .1A=Ae^(-σt) and .1A=Ae^(-βt) and solving for t in both cases I could get the time taken for each oscillator to decay to .1A in terms of σ and β. Time taken for oscillator subject to viscous damping=t1=ln(.1)/-σ and the time taken for the other oscillator=t2=ln(.1)/-β. I have two equations and four unknowns. I know that for the oscillator subject to viscous damping σ=b/2m where m is the mass and b is the damping coefficient.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to solve for the exponential rate coefficients. Rather you need to compare them. The bigger one in magnitude (of beta and sigma) the faster the dampening. Or you might compare the forces throughout a cycle and see which is larger (thus loosing energy more quickly.) This you can do given they are equal at equilibrium. As the system moves past the equilibrium position how do the two types of forces change?
 
The drag force is proportional to the velocity. The velocity is at a maximum at equilibrium so the drag force is at a maximum. As the system moves away from equilibrium the velocity decreases and so would the drag force. The force of friction is the same throughout the cycle so although the two forces are equal at equilibrium the drag force would be less than the force of friction everywhere else in the cycle. The system subject to the force of friction would lose energy quicker right? I think the question was made confusing by the fact that it specifically asked which one would reach .1A. I feel very stupid for spending 3 hours on this problem. Thank you for the help
 
Remember the question's answer in and of itself wasn't the point. The understanding of the physics is. The time you spent is not wasted, it merely didn't apply to the specific question.

Oh, and your analysis sounds quite correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
8
Views
4K