In rovibrational transitions we have following selection rules(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

$$ \Delta v = \pm 1 $$

$$ \Delta J = \pm 1 $$

where ##v## is the vibrational quantum number and ##J## is rotational quantum number.

Now based on whether ##\Delta J## changes to +1 or -1 we have two branches of spectroscopic lines.

They are defined as following:

- iftransitionhappens such that ##\Delta J = +1## that goes in R-branch

- iftransitionhappens such that ##\Delta J = -1## that goes in P-branch

It is also said (eg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotational–vibrational_spectroscopy) that R branch is on the higher frequency side of the Q branch and P branch is on the lower frequency side. This means that the lines in R branch have more photon energy (eg. less wavelength) than lines in the P branch.

So far so good.

But notice how I emphasizedtransitionword above? That's because in every site/book I looked at I see they use word transition without specifying whether it's absorption or emission. It seems as if it doesn't matter but looks like it does.

If we have absorption and ##\Delta J = +1## (say J goes from 0 to 1) then that is R branch. But if we have emission (the same transition in opposite direction where J goes from 1 to 0) we will have ##\Delta J = -1##. Now both of these transitions must be of the same energy but which should go to the R branch? I conclude it must be that the transition specified above in the definition is absorption and not emission.

So why I couldn't find in any resource this? Why did I have to lose 3-4 hours on this trying to figure out all this rather than having a precise definition in the first place? When I see transition I usually first think of emission so I started working examples on my own to understand this R and P branches concepts but I couldn't match it with the definition.

I am disappointed by the physics literature and a loose way of defining things. Or could it be me? Am I missing something from my discussion here? It could be because of lack of sleep I am having these days but I am not seeing it.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I P & Q branches confusion in rovibrational transitions + rant

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**