Transitions in diatomic molecules

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kelly0303
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecules
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on transitions in diatomic molecules as related to molecular spectroscopy, specifically focusing on changes in total angular momentum (J) during photon interactions. Participants explore the implications of angular momentum conservation, selection rules for transitions, and the conditions under which these transitions occur, particularly in the context of electromagnetic (EM) interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that changes in total angular momentum (J) can only be -1, 0, or +1 due to the properties of single photon interactions and the spin of the photon.
  • Others argue that changes greater than one in J require multiphoton events, which necessitate larger EM fields and are typically associated with focused laser excitation.
  • One participant notes that the Q branch (ΔJ = 0) is forbidden for diatomic molecules with zero electronic angular momentum, citing angular momentum conservation.
  • There is a discussion about whether transitions with Δl = 0 are possible, with some asserting that only Δl = ±1 transitions are allowed due to photon spin and parity conservation.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption about Δm, suggesting that Δm = 0 is permissible because the quantization axis does not align with the direction of photon propagation.
  • It is noted that the rules may become more complex when considering interactions beyond the dipole approximation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which certain transitions can occur, particularly regarding the selection rules for Δl and Δm. There is no consensus on the implications of these rules across different orders of EM interactions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying interpretations of angular momentum conservation and selection rules, with some assumptions and conditions remaining unresolved. The complexity of interactions beyond the dipole approximation is acknowledged but not fully explored.

kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Hello! I started reading some stuff about molecular spectroscopy and I see that the changes in the total angular momentum, J, can be -1, 0 or +1 (corresponding to the P, Q and R branches). Is this because the photon carries a spin of 1? Also is this the most general case (assuming only EM interactions), or we can have changes greater that 1 in the J values (but probably very weak)? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Changes in total angular momentum of greater than one (or zero) require multiphoton events. Multiphoton events require much larger EM fields and usually result from a tuned and focused laser excitation.
 
Last edited:
In addition, the Q branch (##\Delta J =0##) is forbidden for diatomics with electronic angular momentum of zero for the same reason (angular momentum conservation).
 
Dr. Courtney said:
Changes in total angular momentum of greater than one (or zero) require multiphoton events. Multiphoton events require much larger EM fields and usually result from a tuned and focused laser excitation.
Thank you for your reply. So for a not intense EM field, a change of 1 is the best you can get, right? What do you mean by "or zero"? Can't you, in general, easily have a change of 1, without violating any conservation?
 
kelly0303 said:
Thank you for your reply. So for a not intense EM field, a change of 1 is the best you can get, right? What do you mean by "or zero"? Can't you, in general, easily have a change of 1, without violating any conservation?

Yes, single photon angular momentum changes of 1 are allowed. Sorry for the awkward, ambiguous grammar.
 
Dr. Courtney said:
Yes, single photon angular momentum changes of 1 are allowed. Sorry for the awkward, ambiguous grammar.
Thank you! One more question, can we have transition for which ##\Delta l = 0##? Given that the photon has a spin of 1, and we conserve parity in EM interaction, I assume that we can only have ##\Delta l = \pm 1##. Is this true for all orders in an EM interactions (i.e. E1, E2, M1 and higher)? Also I assume we can have ##\Delta m = \pm 1##, but can we have ##\Delta m =0##? Given that the photon has as polarization components just ##\pm 1## but not 0, I assume that one can't have ##\Delta m =0##. Is that true? Thank you!
 
kelly0303 said:
Thank you! One more question, can we have transition for which ##\Delta l = 0##? Given that the photon has a spin of 1, and we conserve parity in EM interaction, I assume that we can only have ##\Delta l = \pm 1##.
Indeed, the selection rule is ##\Delta l = \pm 1##, due to the spin of the photon.

kelly0303 said:
Also I assume we can have ##\Delta m = \pm 1##, but can we have ##\Delta m =0##? Given that the photon has as polarization components just ##\pm 1## but not 0, I assume that one can't have ##\Delta m =0##. Is that true?
No. The quantization axis is not the same as the direction of propagation of the photon, so ##\Delta m =0## is allowed.

kelly0303 said:
Is this true for all orders in an EM interactions (i.e. E1, E2, M1 and higher)? Thank you!
Things are a bit more complicated when you go beyond the dipole approximation. See
https://jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh/astr5110_13/notes/selec.pdf
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K