P-Series Convergence: Answers to Common Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter foo9008
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of p-series, specifically focusing on the case when the parameter p is between 0 and 1. Participants explore the implications of this range on the behavior of the series and question the reasoning behind its divergence.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to understand why p-series diverge when p is between 0 and 1, questioning the relationship between the terms of the series and their convergence. Some provide examples and comparisons to the harmonic series to illustrate their points.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various attempts to clarify the divergence of p-series for 0 < p < 1, with some participants offering mathematical comparisons and reasoning. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these comparisons, and several participants express confusion about specific aspects of the reasoning presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express a lack of understanding regarding the harmonic series and its divergence, indicating that further clarification is needed on this topic. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to reconcile different mathematical perspectives.

foo9008
Messages
676
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


http://math.oregonstate.edu/home/pr...stStudyGuides/SandS/SeriesTests/p-series.html

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


why when the p is between 0 and 1 , the p-series diverges? when p is between 0 and 1 , the denominator still become big , when 1/ big number , the number will become smaller than before. ,So, the series will converge , right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
foo9008 said:

Homework Statement


http://math.oregonstate.edu/home/pr...stStudyGuides/SandS/SeriesTests/p-series.html

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


why when the p is between 0 and 1 , the p-series diverges? when p is between 0 and 1 , the denominator still become big , when 1/ big number , the number will become smaller than before. ,So, the series will converge , right?

No, just because the terms get smaller and smaller doesn't mean that the series converges. They give the example of the series 1 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + ..., which is a p-series with p=1. That doesn't converge. To see that it doesn't, we can group the terms this way:

S = 1 + \frac{1}{2} + (\frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{4}) + (\frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{7} + \frac{1}{8}) + ...

(In each group, you have a sum of the form \frac{1}{2^n + 1} + ... + \frac{1}{2^n + 2^n})

If S converges, then certainly it would still converge if you replaced terms by smaller terms. So in each group, replace each term by the smallest term in the group:
S&#039; = 1 + \frac{1}{2} + (\frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4}) + (\frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{8}) + ...

If S converged, then so would S&#039;. But S&#039; = 1 + 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 + ... which clearly diverges.

If you choose p &lt; 1, then the series diverges even worse.
 
You can see that it diverges when ##0<p<1 ## by comparison to the harmonic serie: you have ##\lim_{n\to\infty} n\times \frac{1}{n^p} = +\infty##, and therefore ##\exists N\in \mathbb{N}, \ (n > N \Rightarrow \frac{1}{n^p} > \frac{1}{n}) ##.
 
foo9008 said:

Homework Statement


http://math.oregonstate.edu/home/pr...stStudyGuides/SandS/SeriesTests/p-series.html

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


why when the p is between 0 and 1 , the p-series diverges? when p is between 0 and 1 , the denominator still become big , when 1/ big number , the number will become smaller than before. ,So, the series will converge , right?

Note that for ##p>0## the function ##1/x^p## is strictly decreasing, so
\int_n^{n+1} 1/x^p \: dx &lt; 1/n^p &lt; \int_{n-1}^n 1/x^p \: dx
Summing over ##n \leq N## we have
\int_1^{N+1} x^{-p} \, dx &lt; \sum_{n=1}^N 1/n^p &lt; 1 + \int_1^N x^{-p} \, dx
The integrals are both do-able, and for ##0 < p \leq 1## we have ##\sum 1/n^p \geq \int_1^{\infty} x^{-p} \, dx = +\infty##, so the sum is divergent. If ##p > 1## the partial sums are bounded above by ##1+\int_1^{\infty} x^{-p} \, dx = p/(p-1)##, so ##\sum 1/n^p## converges, and its value lies between 1 and ##p/(p-1)##.
 
Last edited:
geoffrey159 said:
You can see that it diverges when ##0<p<1 ## by comparison to the harmonic serie: you have ##\lim_{n\to\infty} n\times \frac{1}{n^p} = +\infty##, and therefore ##\exists N\in \mathbb{N}, \ (n > N \Rightarrow \frac{1}{n^p} > \frac{1}{n}) ##.
i don't under stand, can you explain further?
 
If you take a positive terms serie, it either converges or diverges to ##+\infty##. In the case of the harmonic serie, it was explained in first post why it diverges ( to ##+\infty## ). From the inequality above, it is clear that the serie of ##\{1/n^p\}_n## will also diverge to ##+\infty## (when ## p < 1 ##)
 
geoffrey159 said:
If you take a positive terms serie, it either converges or diverges to ##+\infty##. In the case of the harmonic serie, it was explained in first post why it diverges ( to ##+\infty## ). From the inequality above, it is clear that the serie of ##\{1/n^p\}_n## will also diverge to ##+\infty## (when ## p < 1 ##)
i don't understand why the harmonic series diverges? can you explain ?
 
foo9008 said:
i don't understand why the harmonic series diverges? can you explain ?

Read reply #4; it is all in there.
 
Ray Vickson said:
Note that for ##p>0## the function ##1/x^p## is strictly decreasing, so
\int_n^{n+1} 1/x^p \: dx &lt; 1/n^p &lt; \int_{n-1}^n 1/x^p \: dx
Summing over ##n \leq N## we have
\int_1^{N+1} x^{-p} \, dx &lt; \sum_{n=1}^N 1/n^p &lt; 1 + \int_1^N x^{-p} \, dx
The integrals are both do-able, and for ##0 < p \leq 1## we have ##\sum 1/n^p \geq \int_1^{\infty} x^{-p} \, dx = +\infty##, so the sum is divergent. If ##p > 1## the partial sums are bounded above by ##1+\int_1^{\infty} x^{-p} \, dx = p/(p-1)##, so ##\sum 1/n^p## converges, and its value lies between 1 and ##p/(p-1)##.
can you explain on it ? i don't understand
 
  • #10
foo9008 said:
can you explain on it ? i don't understand
1 + \int_1^N x^{-p} \, dx &lt; 1 + \int_1^{\infty} x^{-p} \, dx,
because ##x^{-p} > 0## for all ##x > 0## and
\int_1^{\infty} x^{-p} dx = \int_1^N x^{-p} dx +<br /> \underbrace{\int_N^{\infty} x^{-p} dx}_{&gt;0}
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Ray Vickson said:
Note that for ##p>0## the function ##1/x^p## is strictly decreasing, so
\int_n^{n+1} 1/x^p \: dx &lt; 1/n^p &lt; \int_{n-1}^n 1/x^p \: dx
Summing over ##n \leq N## we have
\int_1^{N+1} x^{-p} \, dx &lt; \sum_{n=1}^N 1/n^p &lt; 1 + \int_1^N x^{-p} \, dx
The integrals are both do-able, and for ##0 < p \leq 1## we have ##\sum 1/n^p \geq \int_1^{\infty} x^{-p} \, dx = +\infty##, so the sum is divergent. If ##p > 1## the partial sums are bounded above by ##1+\int_1^{\infty} x^{-p} \, dx = p/(p-1)##, so ##\sum 1/n^p## converges, and its value lies between 1 and ##p/(p-1)##.
can you explain why there is 1 appear in the second line ?
 
  • #12
Ray Vickson said:
1 + \int_1^N x^{-p} \, dx &lt; 1 + \int_1^{\infty} x^{-p} \, dx,
because ##x^{-p} > 0## for all ##x > 0## and
\int_1^{\infty} x^{-p} dx = \int_1^N x^{-p} dx +<br /> \underbrace{\int_N^{\infty} x^{-p} dx}_{&gt;0}
why it will equals to p / p-1 ?
 
  • #13
foo9008 said:
why it will equals to p / p-1 ?

Do the integral and see what you get.
 
  • #14
Ray Vickson said:
Do the integral and see what you get.
i got this
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0499[1].JPG
    DSC_0499[1].JPG
    23.8 KB · Views: 396
  • #15
Mr Vickson answers your question "why the harmonic serie diverges?" by comparing the harmonic serie to an integral. The conclusion of it is that the partial sum ##H_N = \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{n}## is equivalent as ##N \to +\infty## to ##\ln N##. This means that as ##N\to \infty##, ##H_N / \ln N \to 1 ##, showing that ##H_N## can't have a finite limit.
 
  • #16
foo9008 said:
i don't understand why the harmonic series diverges? can you explain ?

Several people (including me) have already explained. Just look at the partial sums:
  1. The first term is greater than \frac{1}{2}
  2. The sum of the first two terms is greater than \frac{2}{2}
  3. The sum of the first four terms is greater than \frac{3}{2}
  4. The sum of the first eight terms is greater than \frac{4}{2}
  5. In general, if you sum up the first 2^n terms, you get something greater than \frac{n+1}{2}
So the partial sums keep growing bigger and bigger, without bound. For a series to be convergent, the partial sums have to be bounded.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foo9008

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K