Parallel Axis Theorem Clarification

Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the application of the parallel axis theorem, which is essential when calculating the moment of inertia for objects rotating about an axis that does not pass through their center of mass. It explains that the theorem is expressed as I = I_cm + mr^2, where I_cm is the moment of inertia about the center of mass, m is the mass, and r is the distance from the center of mass to the new axis. An example provided is the rotation of a uniform disk about an axis perpendicular to the disk, illustrating how to compute the moment of inertia in this scenario. The concept of mass elements (dm) is also discussed, emphasizing their role in integrating to find the total moment of inertia. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately analyzing rotational motion in various physical contexts.
matt57017
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
in what situations would you require the use of the parallel axis theorem?

Also, from the physics book it says that let x and y coordinates of P(a point parallel to the first axis) be a and b. then let dm be a mass element(what does this mean? a point anywhere within the object?) with the general coordinates x and y. the rotational inertia of the body about the axis through P is then I=∫r^2 dm = ∫[(x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2]dm

im a little confused and any clarification would as to how, why, and when this would make sense.

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moment of Inertia, I is defined as \int {r^2}\,dm where dm takes on the value of the masses of all infinitesimal pieces of area. This makes sense since for a finite collection of masses, m_i, moment of inertia is defined as
I= \sum_{i} r_i^2 m_i.

The parallel axis theorem, which states that I = I_{cm} + mr^2 is useful when a mass is being rotated about an axis which does not go through the center of mass. For example, if I am rotating a uniform disk of mass M and radius R about an axis perpendicular to the disk and a distance of r away from its center, then the moment of inertia for this rotation would be I= {\frac{MR^2}{2}}\ + Mr^2.
 
Last edited:
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K