Parameterizing the Tangent Line of Intersection Curve at a Given Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter quietrain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding parametric equations for the tangent line to the intersection curve of a surface defined by the equation x² + y² + x + z = 1 and a plane given by z - x + 2 = 0, specifically at the point (1, 0, -1).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods to parameterize the tangent line, including using derivatives and gradient vectors. Some question the validity of their parameterizations and whether they capture the entire curve.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with participants offering different parameterizations and questioning the correctness of their approaches. Some participants express confusion over discrepancies between their results and the expected answer.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the challenge posed by the parameterization at the specific point leading to undefined behavior, as well as the acknowledgment that different parameterizations can represent the same line.

quietrain
Messages
648
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Consider the curve of intersection of the surface x2 + y2 + x + z = 1 and
the plane z - x + 2 = 0. Find parametric equations for the tangent line to the intersection curve at the point (1; 0;-1).


The Attempt at a Solution



i solve for intersection curve by getting rid of z

i get 1-x2-y2-x = x-2
3-y2 = x2+2x
-y2 = x2+2x-3

let x = t to parameterize

so r(t) = [t , sqrt(-t2-2t+3) , t-2]

r'(t) = (1 , 0.5(-t2-2t+3)-0.5(-2t-2) , 1)

at point (1,0,-1) my t = 1

therefore r'(t) = (1 , 0 , 1) this is a vector parallel to the line right?

therefore the line parameterization at (1,0,-1) is

x = 1 + t
y = 0
z = -1 + t

is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
somethings wrong... i solve it using a different method and got a diff ans :(

∇f = (2x+1, 2y , 1)
∇g = (-1 , 0, 1)

∇f(1,0,-1) = (3,0,1)
∇g(1,0,-1) = (-1,0,1)

so ∇f x ∇g gives me a vector parallel to the line at (1,0,-1) right?
so ∇f x ∇g = 0i -4j + 0k

so parameterized line is
x = 1
y= -4t
z = -1

? which is totally different from my 1st post answer

btw, the given answer is neither of these 2 answers :(...

the answer is x=1, y=2t, z=-1

does anyone know what went wrong?

thanks
 
quietrain said:

Homework Statement


Consider the curve of intersection of the surface x2 + y2 + x + z = 1 and
the plane z - x + 2 = 0. Find parametric equations for the tangent line to the intersection curve at the point (1; 0;-1).


The Attempt at a Solution



i solve for intersection curve by getting rid of z

i get 1-x2-y2-x = x-2
3-y2 = x2+2x
-y2 = x2+2x-3

let x = t to parameterize
That will work for a single point but doesn't actually give a paremeterization for the entire curve- y is not a function of x. You took only the positive square root and so get only part of the curve. What I would have done was complete the square- [itex]x^2+ 2x+ 1+ y^2= 4[/itex] so [itex](x+ 1)^2+ y^2= 2^2[/itex] so the curve projectts down to a circle in the xy-plane with center at (-1, 0) and radius 2. Use the standard sine and cosine parameterization of such a circle for x and y and then use z= x- 2 to get the parameterization for z. However, since (1, 0, -1) is in the part of the curve your parameterization gives, your method almost works.



so r(t) = [t , sqrt(-t2-2t+3) , t-2]

r'(t) = (1 , 0.5(-t2-2t+3)-0.5(-2t-2) , 1)

at point (1,0,-1) my t = 1

therefore r'(t) = (1 , 0 , 1) this is a vector parallel to the line right?
Are you ready for this? At t= 1, [itex](-t^2- 2t+ 3)^{1/2}= 0[/itex] but you have the negative 1/2 power. That is not 0, it "blows up" to infinity. This particular parameterization does not work at this particular point!

therefore the line parameterization at (1,0,-1) is

x = 1 + t
y = 0
z = -1 + t

is this correct?

quietrain said:
somethings wrong... i solve it using a different method and got a diff ans :(

∇f = (2x+1, 2y , 1)
∇g = (-1 , 0, 1)

∇f(1,0,-1) = (3,0,1)
∇g(1,0,-1) = (-1,0,1)

so ∇f x ∇g gives me a vector parallel to the line at (1,0,-1) right?

so parameterized line is
x = 1
y= -4t
z = -1

? which is totally different from my 1st post answer




btw, the given answer is neither of these 2 answers :(...

the answer is x=1, y=2t, z=-1

does anyone know what went wrong?

thanks
Yes, that works. However, one line may have many different parameterizations. For example, the first method above, using the parameterization [itex]x= 2cos(\theta)- 1[/itex], [itex]y= 2sin(\theta)[/itex], [itex]z= 2cos(\theta)- 3[/itex] gives derivatives [itex]x= -2sin(\theta)[/itex], [itex]y'= 2 cos(\theta)[/itex], [itex]z'= -2sin(\theta)[/itex] and, at [itex]\theta= 0[/itex] (which gives the point (1, 0, -1)) [itex]x'= 0[/itex], [itex]y'= 2[/itex], [itex]z'= 0[/itex] which gives the parameterization x= 1, y= 2s, z= -1 (as in your answer key) which is exactly the same line as x= 1, y= 4t, z= -1 except that my s is equal to 2 times your t. This line is simply the line parallel to the y-axis with x= 1, z= -1 at every point and x= 1, y= f(t), z= -1 is a parameterization for every monotone function f(t).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ah... so my prof purposely set it at 0 to blow up my method :(

thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K