Parametric Equation of an Ellipse

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the parametric equations of an ellipse from the given functions x(t) = acos(kt) + bsin(kt) and y(t) = aksin(kt) + bkcos(kt). Participants explore methods to express these equations in a standard ellipse form, ultimately leading to the relationship ( [akx(t) - by(t)]/(a²k - b²k) )² + ( [bkx(t) - ay(t)]/(b²k - a²k) )² = 1. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of inclined ellipses and the importance of manipulating trigonometric identities to achieve a simplified form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric equations
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities
  • Knowledge of conic sections, specifically ellipses
  • Basic skills in solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the standard form of an ellipse from parametric equations
  • Learn about the rotation of axes to simplify conic sections
  • Explore the properties of harmonic oscillators in relation to elliptical motion
  • Investigate the use of trigonometric identities in simplifying complex equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying conic sections, parametric equations, and ordinary differential equations. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of inclined ellipses and their applications in physics and engineering.

Buri
Messages
271
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have the following:

x(t) = acos(kt) + bsin(kt)
y(t) = aksin(kt) + bkcos(kt)

The Attempt at a Solution



I'd like to show this is an ellipse, by actually explicitly finding the equation, but I honestly I have no clue about how to do this. Wiki gives the equation of an ellipse centered around (0,0) to be

x(t) = acos(t)
y(t) = bsin(t)

Here I could do this, but in my version I can't since it has both cos and sin in each function x and y. How would I go about doing this?

Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm how would I write acos(kt) + bsin(kt) as a cos function and aksin(kt) + bkcos(kt) as a sin function? Maybe this would get me somewhere..
 
So I guess I have:

acos(kt) + bsin(kt) = cos(x)cos(kt) + sin(x)sin(kt)

So in other words:

a = cos(x)
b = sin(x)

Which yields:

b/a = tan(x) or x = arctan(b/a)

So in I have: acos(kt) + bsin(kt) = cos(arctan(b/a) - kt)

And I would get y(t) = ksin(artan(b/a) + kt)

Is this all right? :)
 
this is not a case of simple ellipse.. with major and minor axis along x and y direction, instead they are inclined along lines.
work it out by separating cos(kt) and sin(kt) using 2 equations
and then simply cos2(kt) +sin2(kt) =1
all the best
 
And now for the other:

aksin(kt) + bkcos(kt)

I'd like this to be in terms of sine only. So I would like:

k(cos(x)sin(kt) - sin(x)cos(kt)) = ksin(x - kt)

So I'd like:

a = cos(x) and b = sin(x)

So tan(x) = b/a And there again arctan(b/a) = x

So we have:

ksin(x - kt) = ksin(arctan(b/a) - kt)
 
vishal007win said:
this is not a case of simple ellipse.. with major and minor axis along x and y direction, instead they are inclined along lines.
work it out by separating cos(kt) and sin(kt) using 2 equations
and then simply cos2(kt) +sin2(kt) =1
all the best

What do you mean? Sorry I've never worked with parametric equations before and this is actually for ODE's...
 
Buri said:

Homework Statement



I have the following:

x(t) = acos(kt) + bsin(kt)
y(t) = aksin(kt) + bkcos(kt)

manipulating these two equations will lead to
cos(kt) as function of x(t) and y(t) along with some coefficients
and similarly for sin(kt)
then directly use the identity to get a relations between
 
I have this:

cos(kt) = [akx(t) - by(t)]/(a²k - b²k)
sin(kt) = [bkx(t) - ay(t)]/(b²k - a²k)

This is going to get ugly eh?
 
vishal007win said:
manipulating these two equations will lead to
cos(kt) as function of x(t) and y(t) along with some coefficients
and similarly for sin(kt)
then directly use the identity to get a relations between

What is this supposed to look like in the end? As in something like:

x²/m + y²/n = 1?

It doesn't seem like its going to simplify to something like that.. :(
 
  • #10
And btw vishal007win I really appreciate your time, I wouldn't be getting this far without your help!
 
  • #11
yes it is.. :smile:

img35.gif


best i can show you about inclined ellipse...but in the figure , axis are perpendicular, which is not the case here, here the axis are inclined along lines
ak x(t) -b y(t)=0 and bk x(t) -a y(t)=0
 
  • #12
This is what I have:

( [akx(t) - by(t)]/(a²k - b²k) )² + ( [bkx(t) - ay(t)]/(b²k - a²k) )² = 1

But from here, it just doesn't seem to simply down to something nice...would it be okay to leave it like this?
 
  • #13
vishal007win said:
yes it is.. :smile:

img35.gif


best i can show you about inclined ellipse...but in the figure , axis are perpendicular, which is not the case here, here the axis are inclined along lines
ak x(t) -b y(t)=0 and bk x(t) -a y(t)=0

To be honest with you, I don't know enough about my conic sections anymore to be able to tell whether I'm right or wrong, but the two equations you gave above are in my equations, so maybe I'm right? I haven't done conic sections since high school and that's been over 4 years how...
 
  • #14
This question actually has to do with a harmonic oscillator question for my ODE's class. I'm told to let A and B be the distances between the origin and the point where the ellipse intersects the positive side of the x-axis and y-axis, respectively. Let a = max(A,B) and b = min(A,B). In other words, a and b are the semimajor and semiminor axis of the ellipse, respectively. How do I actually get these coordinates now?
 
  • #15
so you are dealing with phase potraits ! are you??
if i am getting correctly what you are asking then,
after finding the equation of ellipse , put x = 0 for finding point of intersection with y-axis, and similarly for B put y=0
 
  • #16
Yes I am actually...I've tried doing this. And the point of it is to show that the eccentricity of all the ellipses in the phase portrat corresponding to the different initial conditions is the same...but it just isn't working :S
 
  • #17
The actual linear system is
X' = [0 1; -u 0]X
 
  • #18
Its the most ugliest ellipse equation I've ever seen and nothing seems to be simplifying down..
 
  • #19
Try a change of coordinates.
 
  • #20
Well to solve the linear system I did use a change of coordinates actually. But its the ellipse that's causing me problems...unless you mean to change coordinates of the ellipse? And that I would have no clue how to do..
 
  • #21
Try to find some angle θ such that upon rotating (x,y) by θ yields a new system, call it (u,v), in which the equation of the ellipse is very simple.
 
  • #22
I've realized a mistake in my solution (I forgot a negative) and now it actually simplifies down to a really simple ellipse! :) I'd like to thank vishal007win for helping me out D H thanks for your input, I've actually learned a lot by trying to change coordinates for my wrong ellipse. Thanks a lot for the help! I really appreciate both of you guy's time! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K