Parametric equations for a hyperbolic paraboloid

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving parametric equations for a hyperbolic paraboloid represented by the equation \(\frac{y^2}{2}- \frac{x^2}{4} - \frac{z^2}{9} = 1\). The correct parametric equations are \(y= \sqrt{2} \cdot \sec(t) \cdot \sec(s)\), \(x=2 \cdot \tan(t) \cdot \sec(s)\), and \(z=3 \cdot \tan(s)\). The user initially faced issues with plotting due to incorrect domain settings for \(s\) and \(t\), which led to strange visual outputs. Adjusting the domains to \(-\frac{\pi}{4}\) to \(\frac{\pi}{4}\) resolved the plotting issues, resulting in a proper representation of the hyperbolic paraboloid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hyperbolic paraboloids and their equations
  • Familiarity with parametric equations
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically secant and tangent
  • Experience with Maple software for plotting
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to use Maple's plot3d function effectively for 3D graphing
  • Study the properties and applications of hyperbolic paraboloids in geometry
  • Explore the implications of vertical asymptotes in trigonometric functions
  • Investigate alternative methods for visualizing complex surfaces in 3D
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineering students, and anyone involved in 3D modeling or surface visualization who seeks to understand hyperbolic paraboloids and their parametric representations.

Townsend
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
I need to find a set of parametric equations for a hyperbolic paraboloid. The hint is that I should review some trigonometric identities that involve differences of squares that equal 1.

The equation is:
<br /> \frac{y^2}{2}- \frac{x^2}{4} - \frac{z^2}{9} = 1 <br />

And what I have is

<br /> y= \sqrt{2}*sec(t)*sec(s) <br />
<br /> x=2*tan(t)*sec(s) <br />
<br /> z=3*tan(s) <br />

I am then suppose to write the maple code and send it to my instructor. The problem is that when I do the plot3d with those equations I get a strange looking thing that looks nothing like what a hyperbolic paraboloid should look like. I did the implicitplot3d for the equation to see what it should look like so I know I am way off.

Can anyone offer me any hints?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My equations might be right but I have the wrong domain for s and t. This is the code
Code:
with(plots);

plot3d([2*tan(t)*sec(s), sqrt(2)*sec(t)*sec(s), 3*tan(s)], t=-4*Pi..4*Pi, s=-4*Pi..4*Pi);

And compare that with
Code:
restart; with(plots);

implicitplot3d(y^2/2-x^2/4-z^2/9=1, x=-10..10, y=-10..10, z=-10..10, grid=[20,20,20]);
 
bump...

Can anyone offer me any ideas?
 
Your equations are correct. And you're right about having a problem with your domains. The sec and tan functions both have multiple vertical asymptotes in the interval [-4\pi,4\pi], so you'll have to do something about that.
 
Tom Mattson said:
The sec and tan functions both have multiple vertical asymptotes in the interval [-4\pi,4\pi], so you'll have to do something about that.

Thanks Mr. Mattson

I finally got the graphs to look reasonable. You're right about the asymptotes being the problem of course. If I go from -Pi/4 to Pi/4 for both s and t, things look good. To get both sheets I used the following code

Code:
with(plots);  
  
surface1:=plot3d([2*tan(t)*sec(s), sqrt(2)*sec(t)*sec(s), 3*tan(s)], t=-P/4i..Pi/4, s=-Pi/4..Pi/4):  
surface1:=plot3d([2*tan(t)*sec(s), -sqrt(2)*sec(t)*sec(s), 3*tan(s)], t=-P/4i..Pi/4, s=-Pi/4..Pi/4):  
display(surface1, surface2);

But thanks again Tom...
:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K