Parity Operator and odd potential function.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the parity operator and its implications for wave functions in quantum mechanics, specifically regarding the potential V(-r) = -V(r). It is established that for an odd parity potential, the Hamiltonian does not commute with the parity operator, indicating that the wave function cannot exhibit even or odd parity. Participants express uncertainty about the question's validity, suggesting a possible typographical error. The analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between potential symmetry and wave function behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of wave functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian operators
  • Familiarity with parity operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Hamiltonian and parity operator commutation
  • Explore examples of even and odd parity potentials in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the concept of wave function symmetry
  • Review typographical error identification in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students in quantum mechanics courses, physics educators, and anyone interested in the mathematical properties of wave functions and their symmetries.

sudipmaity
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a university annual exam question: Show that for a potential V (-r)=-V (r) the wave function is either even or odd parity.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


We can determine whether a wavefunctions' parity is time independent based on if the parity operator commutes with the hamiltonian.As far as I know for even parity potential V (-r)=V (r), hamiltonian and parity will commute and we can show that wave function to have even or odd parity.But for odd parity potential as given by the question the hamiltonian won't commute with the parity as it no longer remains invariant under parity operation.So wavefuntion should not have even or odd parity.I talked with some friends and some of them think that there might be some printing mistake in the question. What do you guys have to say.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To help see if the problem might have a typographical error, consider the one dimensional potential V(x) shown below. Note, V(-x) = -V(x).

Imagine a particle "trapped" in the region -a < x < 0. Consider roughly what the wavefunction for the ground state would look like. Would the wavefunction be even, odd, or neither?
 

Attachments

  • junk potential well.png
    junk potential well.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 677

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K