Parity Transformation of Annihilation Operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the parity transformation of annihilation operators using the operators P_1 and P_2 defined as P_1 = exp[-i (π/2) Σ_k a†(k) a(k)] and P_2 = exp[i (π/2) η_P Σ_k a†(k) a(-k)]. The user successfully demonstrates that P_1 a(k) P_1⁻¹ = -i a(k) through the calculation of B_n, confirming that all B_n = a(k). The user initially encounters a sign error in their derivation, which is resolved by correcting the evaluation of commutators, recognizing they should be the negative of the Kronecker delta.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically the role of annihilation and creation operators.
  • Familiarity with operator algebra and commutation relations.
  • Knowledge of exponential operator forms in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic understanding of parity transformations in quantum field theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of commutation relations in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the derivation of the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula.
  • Learn about the implications of parity transformations in quantum field theory.
  • Investigate the role of Kronecker delta in operator algebra.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on quantum field theory and operator methods. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of parity transformations and operator algebra.

orentago
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given that, for operators A and B:

\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i} \alpha A} B \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i} \alpha A} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infinity} {(\mathrm{i}\alpha)^n \over n!} B_n

where B_0 = B and B_n = [A, B_{n-1}] for n=1,2,...

show that:

P_1 a(\mathbf{k})P_1^{-1}=\mathrm{i}a(\mathbf{k})

and

P_2 a(\mathbf{k})P_2^{-1}=-\mathrm{i}\eta_P a(-\mathbf{k})

Where:

P_1=\exp\left[-\mathrm{i} {\pi \over 2} \sum_{\mathbf{k}} a^\dagger (\mathbf{k}) a(\mathbf{k})\right]

and

P_2=\exp\left[\mathrm{i} {\pi \over 2} \eta_P \sum_{\mathbf{k}} a^\dagger (\mathbf{k}) a(\mathbf{-k})\right]

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



First start by calculating B_1. From the question it is apparent that for P_1, B_0 = B = a(\mathrm{k}) and \alpha=-{\pi \over 2}, with A=\sum_{\mathbf{k}} a^\dagger (\mathbf{k}) a(\mathbf{k}).

Hence:

B_1=[A,B_0]=\left[\sum_{\mathbf{k}} a^\dagger (\mathbf{k}) a(\mathbf{k}), a(\mathbf{k'}) \right]=\sum_{\mathbf{k}} [a^\dagger (\mathbf{k}) a(\mathbf{k}), a(\mathbf{k'})]
=\sum_{\mathbf{k}} a^\dagger (\mathbf{k}) [a(\mathbf{k}), a(\mathbf{k'})]+\sum_{\mathbf{k}} [a^\dagger (\mathbf{k}), a(\mathbf{k'})] a(\mathbf{k})=\sum_{\mathbf{k}} \delta_{\mathbf{kk'}} a(\mathbf{k})=a(\mathbf{k'})

Since B_0=B_1, it is evident that all B_n=B=a(\mathbf{k})

Hence substituting this and the value for alpha into the summation over n, above, and using the fact that this summation is now simply the expansion of the exponential function, one obtains:

\sum_{n=0}^{\infinity} {(-\mathrm{i} \pi / 2)^n \over n!} a(\mathbf{k}) = \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i} \pi / 2} a(\mathbf{k})= -\mathrm{i} a(\mathbf{k})

I could add a similar derivation for P_2, but it's practically the same so I won't. What I'd like to know is how I've picked up a minus sign in my derivation, and so have not obtained the same answer as the question gives.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah no, problem solved. I evaluated my commutators wrongly (they should be the negative of the Kronecker delta, not the positive).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K