Undergrad Partial derivative of Dirac delta of a composite argument

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the relationship between the partial derivative of the Dirac delta function of a composite argument and the Jacobian determinant associated with a function of time and space. The proof involves using a test function and integrating over time and space, leading to the conservation equation for the Jacobian determinant. A critical point raised is the need to ensure the last term in the integration vanishes, which is linked to the conservation condition. There is also a noted error in the manipulation of terms where a minus sign was overlooked. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the definition of weak derivatives in the proof process.
William Crawford
Messages
41
Reaction score
36
TL;DR
I wish to derive a formula for the partial derivative w.r.t. time of Dirac delta of a composite argument
I'm trying to prove the following statement: $$ D\partial_t\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right) = J^i\partial_i\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right), $$ where ##\mathbf{v}## is some function of time and ##n##-dimensional space, ## D ## is the Jacobian determinant associated with ##\mathbf{v}##, that is $$ D = \frac{1}{n!}\epsilon^{i_1i_2\ldots i_n}\epsilon_{j_1j_2\ldots j_n}\partial_{i_1}v^{j_1}\partial_{i_2}v^{j_2}\cdots\partial_{i_n}v^{j_n} $$ and ##J^i## is the vector $$ J^i = \frac{1}{(n-1)!}\epsilon^{ii_2\ldots i_n}\epsilon_{j_1j_2\ldots j_n}\partial_{t}v^{j_1}\partial_{i_2}v^{j_2}\cdots\partial_{i_n}v^{j_n} $$.

So far I've been able to prove that the Jacobian determinant satisfy the conservation equation: $$\partial_t D = \partial_iJ^i.$$
My attempt at proving the above is the following. Let ##\varphi## be a test function (i.e. smooth and compact support), then
$$
\begin{align}
\int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}D\partial_t\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\varphi\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt
&= -\int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\partial_t(D\varphi)\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt \\
&= -\int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\left(\partial_tD\varphi + D\partial_t\varphi\right)\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt \\
&= -\int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\partial_iJ^i\varphi\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt - \int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}D\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\partial_t\varphi\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt \\
&= \int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}J^i\left[\partial_i\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\varphi + \left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\partial_i\varphi\right]\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt - \int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}D\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\partial_t\varphi\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt \\
&= \int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}J^i\partial_i\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\varphi\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt - \int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\left[D\partial_t - J^i\partial_i\right]\varphi\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt
\end{align}
$$
However, I don't see how the last term vanishes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, I think there is an error in the last term, this must be zero because you must be able to reconstruct the conservation condition ...
Ssnow
 
I guess you use the definition of a weak derivative. In your third equality where you interchange between:
##D(\delta\circ v)\partial_t \varphi## and ##(\delta\circ v)\partial_t D\varphi##, you forgot to multiply by another minus sign.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
1K