Partial derivative of Dirac delta of a composite argument

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the equation $$ D\partial_t\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right) = J^i\partial_i\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right) $$ where ##D## is the Jacobian determinant and ##J^i## is a vector derived from the function ##\mathbf{v}##, which is dependent on time and n-dimensional space. The Jacobian determinant satisfies the conservation equation $$\partial_t D = \partial_iJ^i$$. A key point raised is the need for a weak derivative definition to address the vanishing of a specific term in the proof, highlighting the importance of careful handling of derivatives in the context of distributions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac delta functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with Jacobian determinants in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of weak derivatives and distribution theory
  • Proficiency in tensor calculus and differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Dirac delta functions in the context of distributions
  • Learn about Jacobian determinants and their applications in physics
  • Research weak derivatives and their significance in functional analysis
  • Explore tensor calculus techniques for handling composite arguments in derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and researchers working with differential equations, distribution theory, and multivariable calculus, particularly those interested in the applications of the Dirac delta function in complex systems.

William Crawford
Messages
41
Reaction score
36
TL;DR
I wish to derive a formula for the partial derivative w.r.t. time of Dirac delta of a composite argument
I'm trying to prove the following statement: $$ D\partial_t\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right) = J^i\partial_i\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right), $$ where ##\mathbf{v}## is some function of time and ##n##-dimensional space, ## D ## is the Jacobian determinant associated with ##\mathbf{v}##, that is $$ D = \frac{1}{n!}\epsilon^{i_1i_2\ldots i_n}\epsilon_{j_1j_2\ldots j_n}\partial_{i_1}v^{j_1}\partial_{i_2}v^{j_2}\cdots\partial_{i_n}v^{j_n} $$ and ##J^i## is the vector $$ J^i = \frac{1}{(n-1)!}\epsilon^{ii_2\ldots i_n}\epsilon_{j_1j_2\ldots j_n}\partial_{t}v^{j_1}\partial_{i_2}v^{j_2}\cdots\partial_{i_n}v^{j_n} $$.

So far I've been able to prove that the Jacobian determinant satisfy the conservation equation: $$\partial_t D = \partial_iJ^i.$$
My attempt at proving the above is the following. Let ##\varphi## be a test function (i.e. smooth and compact support), then
$$
\begin{align}
\int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}D\partial_t\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\varphi\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt
&= -\int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\partial_t(D\varphi)\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt \\
&= -\int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\left(\partial_tD\varphi + D\partial_t\varphi\right)\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt \\
&= -\int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\partial_iJ^i\varphi\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt - \int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}D\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\partial_t\varphi\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt \\
&= \int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}J^i\left[\partial_i\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\varphi + \left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\partial_i\varphi\right]\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt - \int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}D\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\partial_t\varphi\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt \\
&= \int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}J^i\partial_i\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\varphi\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt - \int_\mathbb{R}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\left(\delta\circ\mathbf{v}\right)\left[D\partial_t - J^i\partial_i\right]\varphi\ d^n\mathbf{x}\,dt
\end{align}
$$
However, I don't see how the last term vanishes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, I think there is an error in the last term, this must be zero because you must be able to reconstruct the conservation condition ...
Ssnow
 
I guess you use the definition of a weak derivative. In your third equality where you interchange between:
##D(\delta\circ v)\partial_t \varphi## and ##(\delta\circ v)\partial_t D\varphi##, you forgot to multiply by another minus sign.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K