Partial derivatives and chain rule

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of partial derivatives and the chain rule in the context of implicit functions. The original poster presents a problem involving the relationship between a function \( u = F(x,y,z) \) and a function \( z = f(x,y) \), specifically focusing on finding the second partial derivative \( f_{xx} \) in terms of the derivatives of \( F \). Additionally, there is a second part of the problem that involves evaluating derivatives at a specific point given an equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the derivatives of \( f \) and \( F \), questioning the validity of the original poster's approach. There are attempts to clarify the implications of the implicit function theorem and corrections to earlier derivations. Some participants express uncertainty about the original problem statement and its assumptions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing corrections and raising questions about the relationships between the functions involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the implicit function theorem, but no consensus has been reached on the correctness of the original poster's attempts or the implications of their findings.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential mistakes in the original calculations, and participants are considering the implications of defining \( f \) in terms of \( F \). The discussion also highlights the need for clarity regarding the assumptions made in the problem setup.

Sho Kano
Messages
372
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


a. Given u=F(x,y,z) and z=f(x,y) find { f }_{ xx } in terms of the partial derivatives of of F.

b. Given { z }^{ 3 }+xyz=8 find { f }_{ x }(0,1)\quad { f }_{ y }(0,1)\quad { f }_{ xx }(0,1)

Homework Equations


Implicit function theorem, chain rule diagrams, Clairaut's theorem

The Attempt at a Solution


\frac { \partial z }{ \partial x } =-\frac { \frac { \partial u }{ \partial x } }{ \frac { \partial u }{ \partial z } } \quad \\ -\frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }z }{ { \partial x }^{ 2 } } =\frac { \partial }{ \partial x } \left[ \frac { \partial u }{ \partial x } { \left( \frac { \partial u }{ \partial z } \right) }^{ -1 } \right] \\ -\frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }z }{ { \partial x }^{ 2 } } =\left( \frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }u }{ \partial { x }^{ 2 } } +\frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }u }{ \partial z\partial x } +\frac { \partial z }{ \partial x } \right) { \left( \frac { \partial u }{ \partial z } \right) }^{ -1 }-{ \left( \frac { \partial u }{ \partial z } \right) }^{ -2 }\left( \frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }u }{ \partial x\partial z } +\frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }u }{ { \partial z }^{ 2 } } +\frac { \partial z }{ \partial x } \right) \left( \frac { \partial u }{ \partial x } \right) \\ \frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }z }{ { \partial x }^{ 2 } } ={ \left( \frac { \partial u }{ \partial z } \right) }^{ -2 }\left( { F }_{ xz }+\frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }u }{ { \partial z }^{ 2 } } \right) \left( \frac { \partial u }{ \partial x } \right) -\left( \frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }u }{ \partial { x }^{ 2 } } +{ F }_{ xz } \right) { \left( \frac { \partial u }{ \partial z } \right) }^{ -1 } is this a correct attempt at part a? I'm not sure how to start part b
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would the derivatives of ##f## depend on ##F##?

Are you sure about this question?
 
PeroK said:
Why would the derivatives of ##f## depend on ##F##?

Are you sure about this question?
I'm not sure what you're asking; this is the problem statement. Are they related by the implicit function theorem?

I think I made a mistake in lines 3 and 4 here's the correction:
-\frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }z }{ { \partial x }^{ 2 } } =\left( \frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }u }{ \partial { x }^{ 2 } } +{ F }_{ xz }\frac { \partial z }{ \partial x } \right) { \left( \frac { \partial u }{ \partial z } \right) }^{ -1 }-{ \left( \frac { \partial u }{ \partial z } \right) }^{ -2 }\left( { F }_{ xz }+\frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }u }{ { \partial z }^{ 2 } } \frac { \partial z }{ \partial x } \right) \left( \frac { \partial u }{ \partial x } \right) \\ \frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }z }{ { \partial x }^{ 2 } } ={ \left( \frac { \partial u }{ \partial z } \right) }^{ -2 }\left( { F }_{ xz }-\frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }u }{ { \partial z }^{ 2 } } \frac { { F }_{ x } }{ { F }_{ z } } \right) \left( \frac { \partial u }{ \partial x } \right) -\left( \frac { { \partial }^{ 2 }u }{ \partial { x }^{ 2 } } -{ F }_{ xz }\frac { { F }_{ x } }{ { F }_{ z } } \right) { \left( \frac { \partial u }{ \partial z } \right) }^{ -1 }
 
PS let ##f(x,y) = x^3 + y## and ##F(x, y, z) = 1##

##f_{xx} = 6x## yet all the derivatives of ##F## are zero.
 
PeroK said:
PS let ##f(x,y) = x^3 + y## and ##F(x, y, z) = 1##

##f_{xx} = 6x## yet all the derivatives of ##F## are zero.
is this right?
z is a function of x and y, so I can write F(x,y,f(x,y))=1, as long as x and y satisfies the relation.
then I want the partial of z with respect to x
F(x,y,f(x,y))=1\\ \frac { \partial }{ \partial x } F=0\\ \frac { \partial F }{ \partial x } +\frac { \partial F }{ \partial z } \frac { \partial z }{ \partial x } =0\\ \frac { \partial z }{ \partial x } =-\frac { \frac { \partial F }{ \partial x } }{ \frac { \partial F }{ \partial z } } now f is in terms of F
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K