Partial Derivatives and the Linear Wave Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the use of partial derivatives in the context of the linear wave equation. It clarifies that when evaluating the slope of the tangent at a specific time, time must be held constant, necessitating the use of a partial derivative with respect to position. The relationship between displacement, position, and time is emphasized, indicating that y is dependent on both x and t. If both x and t were allowed to change, a different derivative, such as the directional or covariant derivative, would be required. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately analyzing wave behavior in physics.
Taulant Sholla
Messages
96
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I'm reading through the derivations of the linear wave equation. I'm following everything, except the passage I highlighted in yellow in the below attachment:
Capture.JPG


Homework Equations


I'm not understanding why partials must be used because "we evaluate this tangent at a particular instant of time."

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems if x, y, and t were all changing then there'd be a need for a partial. As stated in the highlighted text, I'm not getting it. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The displacement y of the string from its equilibrium position (y=0) is a function of both x and t - it depends on where along the string you look, and on the time at which you look at it. Figure 16.19 shows the position of the string at a given time t. So when you find the slope of the tangent at this time t, you are holding the time constant. That means that you must take the partial derivative of y with respect to x - the definition of a partial derivative requires you to hold fixed all independent variables other than the one by which you differentiate.

On your point 3, it is because you are holding t fixed that you need to use the partial derivative. Note that x and t are your independent variables, and that y is the dependent variable. were you to allow both x and t to change, you would need a different kind of derivative that you will probably not have studied yet, and its physical interpretation would be quite different.
 
Very helpful - thank you so much! What kind of derivative is needed if x and t were both changing?
 
It is called the directional derivative, or the covariant derivative.
 
Thank you again.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top