Partial Derivatives: Depend on Form?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of partial derivatives and whether their values depend on the form of the function being analyzed. The original poster presents a scenario involving a function z = f(x,y) and a relationship y = g(x,w), expressing confusion over the implications of changing the form of the function on the partial derivative with respect to y.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of holding variables constant when calculating partial derivatives. Questions arise regarding the ambiguity of partial derivatives based on the specified variables and the need for clarity in defining which variables are fixed.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the importance of specifying which variables are held constant when taking partial derivatives. There is an ongoing exploration of how to ensure that the partial derivative is unambiguous, with various interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to thermodynamics, indicating that the context may involve physical applications of partial derivatives. There is also mention of potential confusion arising from different forms of the same function.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] partial derivatives

Homework Statement


Can the partial derivative of a function depend depend on the form it is in?

Say, z = f(x,y), and y=g(x,w). If I take

[tex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}[/tex]

then I get

[tex]\frac{\partial f(x,y)}{\partial y}[/tex]

which is not necessarily 0. But [itex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}[/itex] is also equal to

[tex]\frac{\partial f(x,g(x,w))}{\partial y}[/tex]

which is identically 0. This is DRIVING ME OUT OF MY MIND.

Also, say we have z = f(x,y) = x^2+y^2+y and we also know that x=y. Then z also equals g(x,y) = x^2+y^2+x.

Thus, we get

[tex]2 y +1 = \frac{\partial f(x,y)}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial z}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial g(x,y)}{\partial y} = 2y[/tex]

which is absurd. What is wrong with my logic?
All of these examples come from thermodynamics.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course the partial derivative depends on the form of the function. When you write a partial derivative you are implicitly assuming that some combination of variables is held constant. When you juggle the form around like that you are changing what you are thinking of as 'constant'. Don't do that. Use the chain rule for partial derivatives and everything will take care of itself.
 
To expound on what Dick just said --- make sure you say which variables are being held constant, *explicitly*.
 
Dick said:
Of course the partial derivative depends on the form of the function. When you write a partial derivative you are implicitly assuming that some combination of variables is held constant.

So, you are saying that partial derivatives do not make sense unless you hold enough variables constant to make the partial derivative unambiguous? That is, whenever I write down I partial derivative, I should always make sure that I have specified enough variables SO THAT THE PARTIAL DERIVATIVE IS INDEPENDENT OF THE FORM OF THE FUNCTION, right?

How do you know when you have specified enough variables to make the partial derivative unambiguous?
 
Last edited:
Uh, when you've specified enough that the function is only a function of one unfixed variable.
 
Dick said:
Uh, when you've specified enough that the function is only a function of one unfixed variable.

What about the first two questions in my last post?
 
The answer to both of those questions is "yes".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K