Partial derivatives for the sign function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of partial derivatives for the function f(x,y) defined using the sign function, specifically f(x,y)=sg\{(y-x^2)(y-2x^2)\}. Participants express uncertainty regarding the evaluation of derivatives, particularly at points where the function transitions between values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to compute partial derivatives using limits and questions how to handle the zero value of the function. Some participants suggest that the derivatives should be zero in regions where the function is constant, while others explore the implications of boundary points on derivative existence.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing insights into the behavior of the function in different regions. There is recognition of the complexity introduced by boundary conditions, and multiple interpretations of the limits are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the function's value changes based on the regions defined by the curves y = x^2 and y = 2x^2, and there is discussion about the implications of these regions on the derivatives. The conversation reflects a lack of consensus on how to approach the limits and the behavior at boundary points.

Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30

Homework Statement


Hi there. Well, I've got some doubts on the partial derivatives for the next function:

[tex]f(x,y)=sg\{(y-x^2)(y-2x^2)\}[/tex] Where sg is the sign function.

So, what I got is:

[tex]f(x,y)=f(x)=\begin{Bmatrix}{ 1}&\mbox{ if }& (y-x^2)(y-2x^2)>0\\0 & \mbox{if}& (y-x^2)(y-2x^2)=0\\-1 & \mbox{if}& (y-x^2)(y-2x^2)<0\end{matrix}[/tex]

How should I get the partial derivatives? I'm sure that for the zero I must use the definition. But in the other cases should I?

Bye, and thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
All three values are constants. The derivative (or partial derivative) of a constant is zero.
 
Thanks!
 
This is the way I've solved it for x. All three values are constants, but I can't just evaluate at (0,0) because its a closed set at that point.

If [tex]x=y=0[/tex]
[tex]\displaystyle\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=\displaystyle\lim_{x \to{0}}{\displaystyle\frac{f(x,0)-f(0,0}{x}}=\displaystyle\lim_{x \to{0}}{\displaystyle\frac{(0-x^2)(0-2x^2-0)}{x}}=\displaystyle\lim_{x \to{0}}{\displaystyle\frac{2x^4}{x}}=0[/tex]

If [tex]y=x^2[/tex], [tex](x,y)=(x_0,x_0^2)[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=\displaystyle\lim_{h \to{0}}{\displaystyle\frac{f(x_0+h,x_0^2)-f(x_0,x_0^2)}{h}}=\displaystyle\lim_{h \to{0}}{\displaystyle\frac{(x_0^2-(x_0+h)^2)(x_0^2-2(x_0+h)^2)-0}{h}}=\displaystyle\lim_{h \to{0}}{\displaystyle\frac{(x_0^2-x_0^2-2x_0h-h^2)(x_0^2-2x_0^2-4x_0h-h^2)}{h}}=[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle\lim_{h \to{0}}{\displaystyle\frac{-h(2x_0-h)(x_0^2+4x_0h+h^2)}{h}}=\displaystyle\lim_{h \to{0}}{-(2x_0-h)(x_0^2+tx_0h+h^2)=-2x_0^3}[/tex]

If [tex](x,y)=(x_0,2x_0^2)[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=\displaystyle\lim_{h \to{0}}{\displaystyle\frac{f(x_0+h,2x_0^2)-f(x_0,2x_0^2)}{h}}=\displaystyle\lim_{h \to{0}}{\displaystyle\frac{(2x_0^2-(x_0+h)^2)(2x_0^2-2(x_0+h)^2)-0}{h}}=\displaystyle\lim_{h \to{0}}{\displaystyle\frac{(2x_0^2-x_0^2-2x_0h-h^2)(2x_0^2-2x_0^2-4x_0h-h^2)}{h}}=[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle\lim_{h \to{0}}{\displaystyle\frac{(x_0^2-2x_0h-h^2)(-h(4x_0+h))}{h}}=\displaystyle\lim_{h \to{0}}{-(x_0^2-2x_0h-h^2)(4x_0+h)=-4x_0^2[/tex]

As [tex]-4x_0^2\neq{-2x_0^3}[/tex] the derivative doesn't exist at the point (0,0).

Is this right?

For y I've proceeded same way. I think its the right way for solving it.

Thanks.
 
I think you are making a mistake in your limits. When you evaluate f(x, y), you should get 1, 0, or -1.
 
Yes, but what about the derivatives? I've received an email with a message from you that doesn't appear here. I think that post pointed the right direction.

I'm not sure about what to do with the boundary points.
 
Now I get what you mean. The left part is wrong. I'll keep thinking on it.
 
I posted something, then deleted, so that might be the email you received.

I think it's helpful to look at the plane as three regions:
Region I - the points above the curve y = 2x^2
Region II - the points below y = 2x^2 and above y = x^.
Region III - the points below y = x^2.

These regions do not include the boundary curves.
In regions I and III, f(x, y) = 1. In region II, f(x, y) = -1.

Clearly, for every point in any of these regions, both partials are zero.

On the boundary curves, f(x, y) = 0.
 
How do I demonstrate it using the limit definition? I see I'm committing a mistake when I try, but I don't know how to do it right.
 
  • #10
I think you need to do one-sided limits (h > 0 and h < 0), and also make different cases for when x < 0 and x > 0.

For example, if (x0, y0) is a point on the graph of y = 2x^2, (x0 + h, y0) will be a point in region II if h > 0 and x0 > 0, but will be a point in region I if h > 0 and x0 < 0.

Draw a graph of the three regions and boundary curves and look at different possibilities. That's what I would advise.
 
  • #11
Thank you Mark.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K