themadhatter1 said:
hmm. aha.. ok let's see...[tex]8a+8b+4c+0d=0[/tex]
[tex]4a-4b+0c+4d=0[/tex]
[tex]2a+2b-1c+0d=1[/tex]
[tex]1a-1b+0c-1d=0[/tex]
Finally haha! a=1/8 b=1/8 c=-1/2 d=0
Thanks, I think we can say that small algebra errors kill. I'll try and be more careful since all my errors were with negatives and simple combining of like terms.
Thanks again!
Glad to see you got it worked out. One thing you could have done is plugged your answers for a and b in that you found earlier using x=1/2 and x=-1/2 to get
[tex]
\begin{align*}<br />
2+4c & = 0 \\<br />
4d & = 0 \\<br />
1/2-c & = 1 \\<br />
-d & = 0<br />
\end{align*}[/tex]
You can easily see what c and d have to equal. Also, having four equations and two unknowns provides a check. If the system is inconsistent, you know you made an algebra mistake somewhere.
themadhatter1 said:
I saw that and that was how I originally got my a=1/8 and b=1/8 but to get the [tex](4x^2+1)[/tex] to equal 0 you'd have to sub in i/2 for x. can you have an imaginary number in a partial fraction decomposition?
If you sub it in you wind up getting a 2 variable equation
[tex]\frac{i}{2}=(i-1)(i+1)c\frac{i}{2}+d[/tex]
[tex]\frac{-1}{4}=c\frac{i}{2}+d[/tex]
You can use complex numbers. If you do that, you'd get
[tex]\begin{align*}<br />
\frac{i}{2} & = (i-1)(i+1)(c\frac{i}{2}+d) \\<br />
0 + \frac{1}{2} i& = -ic - 2d<br />
\end{align*}[/tex]
Since c and d are real, if you equate the real parts of each side, you'd get -2d=0, and the equating the imaginary parts gives you -c=1/2.
The main problem with using complex numbers is that you're much more likely to make algebra mistakes, which, as you have discovered, are easy enough to make already. It's bad enough keeping track of signs, and now you're throwing in multiples of i.