Partial Fractions: Solving 2x^2/(1-x(1+x))

In summary: Yes.Thanks, I just wasn't sure whether the |x|=/= 1 , bit meant I couldn't use let x = 1.The way I like to think of this is as follows.If there are values of A, B, and C which make the following true for all x ,\displaystyle A(1+x)(1-x)+B(1+x)+C(1-x)=2x^2\,, then certainly the same values of A, B, and C will make the same equation true if we exclude x = ±1 .This is called the Heaviside cover-up method. Many claim "cover-up" means you cover up the term in the denominator that van
  • #1
trollcast
Gold Member
282
13

Homework Statement



Use the method of partial fractions to show that:

$$\frac{2x^2}{(1-x(1+x)} $$

, may be written as:

$$-2+\frac{1}{1-x}+\frac{1}{1+x}$$

, where $$\lvert x\rvert\neq1 $$.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I obviously know how to do it but in the solution am I allowed to do, let x = 1, to cancel some of the terms to figure out the constants in the partial fractions? Or do I have to do simultaneous equations by comparing the coefficients?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
trollcast said:

Homework Statement



Use the method of partial fractions to show that:$$\frac{2x^2}{(1-x(1+x)} $$, may be written as:
$$-2+\frac{1}{1-x}+\frac{1}{1+x}$$, where $$\lvert x\rvert\neq1 $$.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I obviously know how to do it but in the solution am I allowed to do, let x = 1, to cancel some of the terms to figure out the constants in the partial fractions? Or do I have to do simultaneous equations by comparing the coefficients?
It depends upon the stage in the solution at which you would set x = 1, or x = -1 .
 
  • #3
Hi trollcast! :smile:

I guess you could let x=1, but I don't see how that would help you...
Neither expression is defined if you do that, and you won't be able to properly compare them.
 
  • #4
Ok I'll type my solution out to check its right:

$$Let \frac{2x^2}{(1-x)(1+x)} = A + \frac{B}{(1-x)}+\frac{C}{(1+x)} $$
$$\frac{A(1+x)(1-x)+B(1+x)+C(1-x)}{(1-x)(1+x)}=2x^2$$
$$\Rightarrow A(1+x)(1-x)+B(1+x)+C(1-x) = 2x^2$$
Compare coefficients of x^2: $$-A=2\\A=-2$$
Let x = 1: $$2B=2\\B=1$$
Let x = -1: $$2c=2\\c=1$$

Is that ok?
 
  • #5
Nice!

Slightly unconventional, but it seems fine to me. :wink:
 
  • #6
trollcast said:
Ok I'll type my solution out to check its right:

$$Let \frac{2x^2}{(1-x)(1+x)} = A + \frac{B}{(1-x)}+\frac{C}{(1+x)} $$
$$\frac{A(1+x)(1-x)+B(1+x)+C(1-x)}{(1-x)(1+x)}=2x^2$$
The above line should be:
[itex]\displaystyle \frac{A(1+x)(1-x)+B(1+x)+C(1-x)}{(1-x)(1+x)}=\frac{2x^2}{(1-x)(1+x)}[/itex]
$$\Rightarrow A(1+x)(1-x)+B(1+x)+C(1-x) = 2x^2$$
Compare coefficients of x^2: $$-A=2\\A=-2$$
Let x = 1: $$2B=2\\B=1$$
Let x = -1: $$2c=2\\c=1$$

Is that ok?
It's a fairly well known method (trick).

Another variation is to do those substitutions for x immediately after you have

[itex]\displaystyle A(1+x)(1-x)+B(1+x)+C(1-x)=2x^2\ [/itex]

to get B and C.

Then plug those values in & let x be some convenient number, like x = 0, to find A .
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Thanks, I just wasn't sure whether the |x|=/= 1 , bit meant I couldn't use let x = 1.
 
  • #8
trollcast said:
Thanks, I just wasn't sure whether the |x|=/= 1 , bit meant I couldn't use let x = 1.

Well spotted.
In this case you can get away with it.

When you have your final equation, the solution for A, B, and C is unique and valid for any x, not just for |x|≠1.
After that the same solution applies if you restrict x to |x|≠1.
Formally, you should write something like that down.

Btw, the ultimate check is when you substitute your A, B, and C, and verify they form a proper solution.
When you have that, the steps how you got there become irrelevant (although your teacher may want to see them ;)).
 
  • #9
I like Serena said:
Well spotted.
In this case you can get away with it.

When you have your final equation, the solution for A, B, and C is unique and valid for any x, not just for |x|≠1.
After that the same solution applies if you restrict x to |x|≠1.
Formally, you should write something like that down.

Btw, the ultimate check is when you substitute your A, B, and C, and verify they form a proper solution.
When you have that, the steps how you got there become irrelevant (although your teacher may want to see them ;)).

So the where |x|≠1 is only so it makes mathematical sense otherwise you would imply the denominator could be 0.
 
  • #10
trollcast said:
So the where |x|≠1 is only so it makes mathematical sense otherwise you would imply the denominator could be 0.

Yes.
 
  • #11
trollcast said:
Thanks, I just wasn't sure whether the |x|=/= 1 , bit meant I couldn't use let x = 1.
The way I like to think of this is as follows.

If there are values of A, B, and C which make the following true for all x ,
[itex]\displaystyle A(1+x)(1-x)+B(1+x)+C(1-x)=2x^2\,,[/itex]​
then certainly the same values of A, B, and C will make the same equation true if we exclude x = ±1 .
 
  • #12
This is called the Heaviside cover-up method. Many claim "cover-up" means you cover up the term in the denominator that vanishes, but I suspect it really refers to the fact you're doing something sketchy because you're multiplying both sides of the equation by 0. :wink:
 

FAQ: Partial Fractions: Solving 2x^2/(1-x(1+x))

1. What is the purpose of solving partial fractions?

The purpose of solving partial fractions is to break down a complex fraction into smaller, simpler fractions. This allows for easier manipulation and calculation of the original fraction.

2. How do you determine the partial fractions of a given fraction?

To determine the partial fractions of a given fraction, you must first factor the denominator and then set up a system of equations using the coefficients of each term in the expanded form. Solving this system of equations will give you the partial fraction decomposition.

3. Can all fractions be solved using partial fractions?

No, not all fractions can be solved using partial fractions. This method can only be used for rational functions, which are fractions with polynomial functions in the numerator and denominator.

4. How do you know if the partial fraction decomposition is correct?

You can check the accuracy of the partial fraction decomposition by adding all the fractions back together. The resulting fraction should be equivalent to the original fraction.

5. Are there any special cases to consider when solving partial fractions?

Yes, there are a few special cases to consider when solving partial fractions. These include repeated linear factors, irreducible quadratic factors, and improper fractions. Each of these cases requires a slightly different approach in the partial fraction decomposition process.

Similar threads

Back
Top