Particle disappearing from view if it exceeds c

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter NanakiXIII
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of a particle in hyperbolic motion under constant force, specifically addressing the conditions under which it may disappear from view for an observer. The participant argues that even if a particle exceeds the speed of light (c), it remains visible due to the light emitted from its trajectory potentially reaching the observer, albeit with significant Doppler shifts. However, the participant acknowledges a contradiction with their reference material, which states that a particle exceeding c would indeed disappear from view. The conversation highlights the complexities of relativistic effects, particularly in relation to redshift and the interpretation of light cones.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with hyperbolic motion in physics
  • Knowledge of Doppler effect in light
  • Ability to interpret space-time diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of exceeding the speed of light in special relativity
  • Study the concept of light cones and their significance in relativistic physics
  • Explore the mathematical framework of redshift and its applications
  • Investigate the effects of acceleration on particle trajectories in relativistic contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the implications of relativistic motion and light behavior in high-velocity scenarios.

NanakiXIII
Messages
391
Reaction score
0
I was working on a relativity problem in the context of electrodynamics and the problem was to show that a particle in hyperbolic motion (i.e. under the influence of a constant force) in one spatial dimension would never disappear from view for an observer at a position x once it was in view, providing its velocity did not exceed the speed of light. The idea was to draw some light cones on different points of the trajectory and indeed you can see that once the particle was visible at a point x at time t, that point x would lie within every light cone for later points in time.

What I don't see, however, is how the particle would ever disappear from view even if its velocity did exceed c. If you draw a trajectory for a particle with velocity 2c or 20c, you can still draw a line with slope -1 from each point on the time axis to some point on the trajectory and the light from the particle emitted at that point could still reach the observer at x=0. The light would be badly Dopplershifted and from some points you would see the particle moving backwards, but you would still see it.

My book, however, explicitly states that the particle would disappear from view if its velocity exceeds the speed of light, so apparently I'm making some error in my thinking here. In my reasoning there also seems to be an asymmetry in the situation (namely that when the particle is moving towards an observer, it seems it would be moving backwards while it would just seem Dopplershifted when moving away from an observer - this I conclude from looking at subsequent light cones I drew), which I'm not sure should be there. If anyone could point out what my error is, I'd appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just looking at the space-time diagram, I agree with you. Any signal emitted by the particle intercepts my world-line sometime in the finite-future. But there will come a time when the signal is red-shifted to zero, which is the same thing as disappearing from view (in my interpretation).
 
Ah, that is true. If its velocity exceeds c at some point due to the acceleration, it'll be shifted to zero as it crosses that barrier. I wonder what the meaning of imaginary red-shift would be. Thanks for your reply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K