I Particle distribution as a function of radius in astrophysics

AI Thread Summary
In astrophysics, there is no universally accepted function that describes particle distribution as a function of radius from a central body. The discussion focuses on the example of Saturn's rings, where the density and distribution of particles vary with distance from the planet. While specific models may exist for certain systems, a general model applicable to all scenarios is lacking. The inquiry emphasizes the need for clarity in defining the radius and the context of the particle distribution. Overall, the quest for a comprehensive model remains unresolved.
MMS
Messages
146
Reaction score
4
Hello everyone,

I am working on a project in astrophysics in which I need to include now some type of particle distribution (as a function of the radius).
I was wondering if there is some accepted function that would describe the number of particles per radius in astrophysics. Saturn's rings would make a perfect example for what I'm trying to do. So say for Saturn's rings, is there anything known about the distribution or the density of particles (as a function of the radius) in it?

Thanks in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You need to describe the case you are looking at. Radius of what?
 
mathman said:
You need to describe the case you are looking at. Radius of what?
Hello and thanks for the reply.

The radius I'm talking about is the distance from the central object.

I want to know if there exists some general type of model or function which describes the number of particles orbiting a central body as a function of how far they are from it. For example, say we have a central body and we have particles orbiting it, then at a distance of r1 from it there are A particles, at a distance r2 there are B particles (A and B are the number of particles) and so on. That's why I took Saturn's rings as an example.

I hope I was clearer now.
 
MMS said:
I want to know if there exists some general type of model or function which describes the number of particles orbiting a central body as a function of how far they are from it

There is not.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top