Particle in abox : continuous functions problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of the wave function (ψ) for a particle in a one-dimensional box, particularly focusing on the implications of an infinite potential (V) outside a specified region. Participants explore the mathematical consistency of the second derivative of ψ and its relationship with the potential energy, as well as the conditions under which ψ can be zero or its derivatives can be infinite.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the interpretation of the second derivative of ψ being infinite when V is infinite, suggesting that this leads to an infinite jump in the first derivative, which contradicts Shankar's assertion.
  • Another participant argues against the first claim, stating that if V is infinite, then ψ must be zero for |x| > L/2, implying that ψ'' can indeed be infinite without contradiction.
  • A third participant supports the idea that Shankar is not wrong, emphasizing that the discussion pertains to a general case where V is infinite, and questions how one determines whether ψ is zero or ψ'' is infinite.
  • Further clarification is provided that "infinite" should be treated with caution, suggesting that one could consider a finite potential and analyze the continuity of ψ and its derivatives at the boundaries.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of an infinite potential on the wave function and its derivatives. There is no consensus on whether Shankar's interpretation is correct, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the conditions under which ψ or its derivatives can be infinite.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for precision in discussing infinite values and continuity conditions, suggesting that assumptions about the potential and boundary conditions are critical to the analysis.

g.prabhakar
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was studying particle in a box from shankar and I couldn't get the following point. If V is infinite at for x > L/2 and x < L/2, so is double derivative of psi. Now Shankar mentions that it follows the derivative of psi has a finite jump. I am not able to get this point because according to my understanding if a function f is such that
f ''(x) = k, a constant, x<=a
f ''(x) = infinite , x>a
then its integration (which comes out to be f '(x) ) from say x=0 to any point x>a (say x=2a) becomes infinite and therefore jump is infinite, (which is contradictory to what shankar mentions)
Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If V is infinite at for x > L/2 and x < L/2, so is double derivative of psi.
If Shankar said that, then he's the one who is wrong. If V is infinite, then ψ''/ψ is infinite. In other words, ψ is 0 for |x| > L/2.
 
Please correct me if I am wrong but I don't think Shankar is wrong. He is discussing a general case(not specifically particle in a box) where V is infinite for x > L/2. Now time independent Schrödinger says
ψ'' = [- 2 m(E-V)/hbar^2)]ψ.
So it is perfectly consistent mathematically that ψ'' is infinite. I couldn't get why ψ'' it can't be infinite? Ofcourse, even ψ can be 0, but the point is how do u decide if either ψ=0 or ψ'' is infinite?
 
g.prabhakar said:
He is discussing a general case(not specifically particle in a box) where V is infinite for x > L/2. Now time independent Schrödinger says
ψ'' = [- 2 m(E-V)/hbar^2)]ψ.
So it is perfectly consistent mathematically that ψ'' is infinite. I couldn't get why ψ'' it can't be infinite? Ofcourse, even ψ can be 0, but the point is how do u decide if either ψ=0 or ψ'' is infinite?

Well, "infinite" without further explanation means "undefined".
One needs to be more precise. E.g., you could take V to be a finite constant "C" for
|x| > L/2 and solve the Schroedinger equation for that case, under the conditions
that ψ is suitably continuous everywhere (meaning that ψ and its first derivative
must match at the L/2 boundaries). Then normalize the resulting wavefunction,
and look at what happens as [tex]C \to \infty[/tex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K