Particle in an infinite square well - interval -d/2<x<d/2

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle in an infinite square well defined on the interval ##-L/2

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correct forms of the eigenfunctions for the infinite square well and the normalization factors. There is a focus on the orthogonality of the eigenfunctions and the implications of labeling conventions for energy states.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing corrections and clarifications regarding the eigenfunctions and normalization factors. Some participants express confusion over the labeling conventions for the states, while others suggest that different conventions can still yield valid results.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a potential misunderstanding regarding the normalization factors and the definitions of the eigenfunctions. Participants are also navigating the implications of using different conventions for labeling the quantum states.

71GA
Messages
208
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Particle is in an infinite square well of width ##L## on an interval ##-L/2<x<L/2##. The wavefunction which describes the state of this particle is of form:
$$\psi = A_0\psi_0(x) + A_1\psi_1(x)$$
where ##A_1=1/2## and where ##\psi_0## and ##\psi_1## are ground and first excited state. What are ##\psi_0## and ##\psi_1## like? Write them down. Calculate ##A_0##.

Homework Equations


I allways used this equation to get normalisation factors:
$$\int\limits_{-d/2}^{d/2} \psi =1$$
If i recall corectly the eigenfunctions are orthogonal? I remember something about this and i think there is different way too solve this problem using this orthogonality. Please someone show me, because i am interested in both ways!

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that normalisation factor should be ##A_0=\sqrt{3}/2## but what i got was totally different. I think i chose ##\psi_0## and ##\psi_1## wrong. Here is how i got the wrong result:
http://shrani.si/?f/OH/aKLhcp9/582013-01837.jpg

Is it possible that I should use ##\psi_0(x) = \cos \left(\frac{(2N-1)\pi}{d}x\right)## where ##\boxed{N=1}## and ##\psi_1(x) = \sin \left(\frac{2N\pi}{d}x\right)## where ##\boxed{N=1}##?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're correct that your initial eigenfunctions are wrong, but your suggested corrections are not quite right either (but really close! :) ). N labels the energy states, so that the ground state is N=1 and the first excited state is N=2.

Using that in your new eigenfunctions should result in the correct answer. I didn't go in detail through your method though.

Edit: Whoops, don't forget the \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} factor in those new eigenfunctions also!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Whoops, don't forget the ##\sqrt{2/L}## factor in those new eigenfunctions also!
What i thought was: "Oh! ##A_0## and ##A_1## are already there and are playing the role of ##\sqrt{2/L}##". I guess i missread the instructions...

I don,t understand the why N=2 though. If i plug in the N=1 in the equations i provided (i added factor of ##\sqrt{2/L}##) I get ##\psi_0(x) = \sqrt{2/L}\cos \left(\frac{1\pi}{d}x\right)## (this should be the ground state) and ##\psi_1(x) =\sqrt{2/L} \sin \left(\frac{2\pi}{d}x\right)## (this should be first excited state).
 
Typically, you label the states n=1, n=2, n=3, and so on. You don't use the same n for different states. The eigenfunctions would be given by
$$\phi_n(x) = \begin{cases}
\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}\cos \frac{n\pi x}{L}, & n\text{ odd} \\\\
\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}\sin \frac{n \pi x}{L}, & n\text{ even}
\end{cases}$$ for ##-L/2 \le x \le L/2## and 0 elsewhere. Following this convention for labeling the states, the energy of each state is given succinctly by
$$E_n = \frac{\hbar^2 n^2 \pi^2}{2mL^2}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
If i understand your point you wanted to say that my sugestion would have worked, but is not written in accordance to convention?
 
I was just clarifying what TheShrike meant. You can use whatever convention you want as long as it works for you.
 
Yes i know that. But would my own convention work?
 
It worked and i got the solution ##A_0 = \sqrt{3}/2##. Thank you all for your help.
 
71GA said:
What i thought was: "Oh! ##A_0## and ##A_1## are already there and are playing the role of ##\sqrt{2/L}##". I guess i missread the instructions...

I don,t understand the why N=2 though. If i plug in the N=1 in the equations i provided (i added factor of ##\sqrt{2/L}##) I get ##\psi_0(x) = \sqrt{2/L}\cos \left(\frac{1\pi}{d}x\right)## (this should be the ground state) and ##\psi_1(x) =\sqrt{2/L} \sin \left(\frac{2\pi}{d}x\right)## (this should be first excited state).

Oh, I see what you were doing now. A conflict of conventions, as vela stated. My mistake.

Looks like you had the answer all along. :wink:
 
  • #10
TheShrike said:
My mistake.

Nope. The mistake is always a comunication :). If you were here and i could ask you in person we would solve the problem in first two sentances. But writing and reading is sometimes blah :). We should create some sort of a Skype Q&A site ;)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K