Particle is located a distance x meters

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jbreezy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work done on a particle subjected to a force of cos(πx/3) Newtons while moving from x = 1 to x = 2. Participants clarify that the total work is determined by integrating the force function over the specified interval, specifically using the integral from 1 to 2 of f(x)dx. It is emphasized that negative work should not be treated as positive; instead, the total work is the area above the graph minus the area below it. The conclusion is that in this case, the work done is zero since the areas above and below the x-axis are equal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically definite integrals.
  • Familiarity with the concept of work in physics as it relates to force and displacement.
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, particularly cosine.
  • Ability to interpret graphical representations of functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of definite integrals and their applications in physics.
  • Learn about the physical interpretation of work done by variable forces.
  • Explore the implications of negative work in mechanical systems.
  • Investigate graphical methods for calculating areas under curves.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics and mathematics, particularly those studying mechanics and integral calculus, as well as educators looking for examples of work-energy principles.

Jbreezy
Messages
582
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When a particle is located a distance x meters from the origin, a force of cos(PIx/3) Newtons acts on it. How much work is done in moving the particle from x = 1 to x =2? Interpret your answer by considering the work done from x =1 to x = 1.5 and from x = 1.5 to x = 2


Homework Equations



So the integral isn't a problem.
If you graph this function I'm sure you know the sign change where cos(pix/3) dips below the x-axis at 1.5. I'm just wondering if I should give my answer as the sum of the neg work and positive work. If the work is negative doesn't it mean it is on the opposite direction? But I still say oh this has done. Neg + pos work

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since they are talking about "work" I think they expect a more "physical" explanation. Here, you are doing work from x= 1 to x= 3/2 but then works is being done from x= 3/2 to 2. It's like doing work to push an object to the top of a hill, then getting work out by allowing the object to run down the other side.
 
Ah so rolling a rock up a hill and letting it roll the other side? Do I consider the negative work as positive so I add the area above the graph and the area below for total work?
 
No, you do NOT "consider the negative work as positive". The total work done is the "area above the graph minus the area below the graph"- in other words precisely \int_1^2 f(x)dx
 
Yeah so you do no work then with this problem. The integrals are equal above and below
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K