Particle Movement w/o Knowing a or v

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ronnin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Movement Particle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the motion of an object dropped from a cliff and subsequently tossed upwards, with the challenge of determining the cliff's height and the object's initial velocity without knowing the gravitational acceleration on an unknown planet.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore breaking the problem into two parts: the upward toss and the subsequent fall. Questions arise regarding the relationships between the unknowns, including the cliff height, acceleration, and initial velocity. There is discussion about the equations needed to relate these variables and whether the initial conditions can be effectively utilized.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, suggesting various approaches to isolate the unknowns. Some guidance has been offered regarding the equations that could be used, but there is no consensus on a specific method or solution path yet.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints due to the lack of information about the gravitational acceleration and the initial velocity of the object. Participants are questioning the validity of their equations and the assumptions made in the problem setup.

Ronnin
Messages
168
Reaction score
1
Object is dropped from a cliff of unknown height. I'm on another planet without the knowledge of the planet's gravitational acceleration. The object takes 4.15s to reach the bottom. Again, from the top of the cliff I toss the object upwards to a height of 2m then it falls back to the cliff bottom. This takes 6.3s.
I solved for the height of the cliff using the standard x=x+vt+1/2at^2 and yeilded -8.6115s^2(a). How can I move on with upward then downward equation with only knowing a=cliff height/8.6115s^2 and not knowing the initial velocity of the object being thrown upward. Any suggestions on what to start solving for first?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When dealing with an object tossed upwards that is under a constant acceleration downwards, it is often easier to think of it as two problems:

In the first, the ball is thrown upwards, and stops 2m up. In the second, it is dropped freely from 2m above the clifftop. In the second you do know the initial velocity...
 
You have 3 unknowns, x, the height of the cliff, a, the acceleration, and u, the initial velocity in part 2. So you need 3 equations to find them. The first one, which you have, is [itex]x=\frac{1}{2}at^2_{1}[/itex], where t1=4.15s, the second one uses that same equation you quoted, but with different values for x, v and t, (use the second situation) and the third one is for the initial velocity u in terms of acceleration and distance only. You don't want to include the time, so do you know the equation you'll need? Think of a part of situation 2 where you know the distance and the final velocity. (Think about what the velocity of a body thrown upwards is at its maximum height.) Then you need to rearrange and substitute until you have the unknown you want. I hope this isn't too cryptic, I have a feeling it is. Just say if you don't follow me.
 
So am I right to solve for a in the first equation? Doest the second look like 2m=(8.6115s^2)a+vt+[(x/(8.6115s^2)t^2]/2 or am I way off?
 
Quick question. If I have 5m*s^2,then I square that do you get 25m^2*s^4 ? Reason I ask is the following. I setup an equation for the upward motion as follows. 0=V^2 + 2a(2meters) and wound up with V=2m(-a)^(1/2)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K