Particle speed relativity question

AI Thread Summary
In the scenario of two protons moving away from each other at speeds of .555c, an observer on Earth measures their speeds differently than expected due to relativistic effects. The correct speed for each proton, calculated using the relativistic velocity addition formula, is .303c. The initial assumption of simply dividing the speeds reflects a misunderstanding of Galilean relativity, which does not apply at high velocities. It's crucial to recognize when to use relativistic equations instead of relying on intuitive kinematic principles. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving problems involving high-speed particles accurately.
Artichoke
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Two protons are moving away from each other. In the frame of each proton, the other proton has a speed of .555c.[In the rest frame of the Earth the protons are moving in the opposite directions with equal values of speed. What does an observer in the rest frame of the Earth measure for the speed of each proton?
Enter your answers numerically separated by a comma



I thought I would just divide by 2... clearly it is wrong. The answer is .303c, after failing many tries on mastering physics.
I want to know how you do this problem. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem is that you assumed "Galilean Relativity" where velocities add directly. For higher speeds this line of thinking fails. Velocities don't add directly, they add in a weird way. You should have some formula for this in your notes or text, something along the line of "velocity addition".

A key thing to realize here is that since we have high speed objects we cannot add velocities directly. Intuitively we think that velocities add directly and this is confirmed by our experience with "slow" objects (slow being up to jet speed and beyond...). But when you have higher speed objects you need to stop trusting your intuition and look at the theory, the theory of relativity.

So one thing you want to ask yourself whenever you see problems like this, ask "Is this relativistic?". If not, proceed with your intuitively understood kinematic equations. If it is relativistic you need to consider the equations of relativity.
 
You start by writing down the equation for transforming velocities.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Replies
54
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
17K
Replies
13
Views
848
Back
Top