Particle & Wave Nature of EM Energy: Questions Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karthikeyan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles Waves
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the particle and wave nature of electromagnetic (EM) energy, particularly light. It addresses the confusion surrounding how light can travel without a medium, suggesting that while waves typically require a medium, light behaves differently, possibly due to an undetectable medium. The relationship between particles and waves is explained through Einstein's equation E=mc² and the concept of wave-particle duality in quantum physics. Participants emphasize that every particle can be viewed as a wave, and the distinction lies in how they are perceived in different contexts, such as in quantum experiments. Ultimately, the nature of light and its propagation remains a complex topic with unanswered questions in physics.
Karthikeyan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi friends,
I have some question regarding particle and wave nature of EM energy.

1. What is a wave and a particle? How are they related?
2. Also, we know that sun light travels through the universe down to earth..so light can travel without any medium...But waves do require medium to travel..so how is it? Does the EM energy takes particle form to traverse medium less area and wave form in a medium?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A wave does not have matter but a particle does.
And who said wave needs a medium to travel ! well they are related by einstins relativity equation.E=mc square. and can be explained by the wave particle duality of quantum physics.
every particle is wave and wave is particle. it may seem strange but has meen proved.
 
Thanks for the replies...I asked this question becoz I had few basic doubts now that with these replies let me formulate them too
1. Fine that light can travel without a medium but how does it happen...In a medium I can say that the energy propagates itself through the medium but how is it where there is no medium
2. Fine again that E=mc^2 relates particle to wave, but I would appreciate a more practical explanation since that would help me understand few basics in quantum physics..I mean wave is energy packets right then what is particle...is it a single energy packet or something like that
 
confused!

priya_india said:
A wave does not have matter but a particle does.
And who said wave needs a medium to travel ! well they are related by einstins relativity equation.E=mc square. and can be explained by the wave particle duality of quantum physics.
every particle is wave and wave is particle. it may seem strange but has meen proved.

Does every particle is a wave or every particle acts as if guided by a wave between the position measurements? I am really confused about that.
Thanks
 
Karthikeyan said:
Thanks for the replies...I asked this question becoz I had few basic doubts now that with these replies let me formulate them too
1. Fine that light can travel without a medium but how does it happen...In a medium I can say that the energy propagates itself through the medium but how is it where there is no medium
It's not that anybody knows that light waves aren't disturbances in some medium. It's just that the medium is, so far, undetectable. So what would you say about this hypothetical medium? Anyway, Einstein developed a nice kinematics that doesn't require referencing the light medium -- and physicists can carry on with their work as if such a medium doesn't exist. But really, nobody knows.

Karthikeyan said:
2. Fine again that E=mc^2 relates particle to wave, but I would appreciate a more practical explanation since that would help me understand few basics in quantum physics..I mean wave is energy packets right then what is particle...is it a single energy packet or something like that
A wave is a frequency distribution. A particle is what's being distributed.

For example, in quantum experiments involving very weak light going through, say, a double-slit apparatus and producing a predictable pattern (after thousands of 'dots' had been produced) of individually appearing 'dots' (that is, the patterns are generated dot-by-dot) on a detecting screen. You can think of the individual 'dots' as the particles (or photons) in this sort of situation and their distribution on the screen as the wave (or, in the case of a double-slit setup, what's produced via the interaction or interference of two waves).

What are the precise physical characteristics of the 'optical disturbance(s)' (the light) that traveled between the emitter and the detecting screen to produce the observed pattern? Nobody knows. But qm treats the situation between emission and detection as if it were a wave.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K