Patent with technology not on the market yet.

  • Thread starter Thread starter nukapprentice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Patent Technology
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of submitting a patent for technology that is still in the research phase, contrasting it with technology that is already available in the market. Participants explore the implications of patenting versus keeping inventions as trade secrets, as well as the criteria for patentability such as novelty, usefulness, and non-obviousness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that it is possible to patent technology that is still in the research phase, as long as it meets the criteria of being new, useful, and non-obvious.
  • Others argue that once technology is in the public domain, it cannot be patented, and selling an invention before filing a patent application forfeits the right to patent it.
  • There is a suggestion that keeping an invention as a trade secret may be preferable for some technology companies, as they may choose not to disclose their best innovations through patents.
  • Examples of trade secrets are discussed, including Coca-Cola's recipe and manufacturing techniques in semiconductor production, highlighting the distinction between patenting and maintaining trade secrets.
  • One participant clarifies that a novel invention can utilize existing technology in an original way, which may still be patentable.
  • The concept of 'non-obviousness' is mentioned as a significant hurdle in the patenting process, with some expressing that this requirement can be subjective and context-dependent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the patentability of technology in the research phase versus existing technology. The discussion remains unresolved, with differing opinions on the implications of patenting and trade secrets.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the criteria for patentability, such as non-obviousness, can vary based on context and may not be a permanent condition. There is also an acknowledgment of the potential for confusion regarding what constitutes public domain technology.

nukapprentice
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was wondering if someone with patent experience could help me. Is it possible to submit a patent which uses technology which is still in the research phase? If so, how does this differ than one which utilizes technology already out there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nukapprentice said:
Hello, I was wondering if someone with patent experience could help me. Is it possible to submit a patent which uses technology which is still in the research phase? If so, how does this differ than one which utilizes technology already out there?
Any process or product can be patented. Patented inventions are supposed to be new, as well as useful and non-obvious.

It is certainly appropriate to patent something that is under research.

On the other hand, if one wishes to keep the invention a trade secret, do not patent it. Technology companies keep the best stuff under wraps, and do not patent/disclose it.
 
Astronuc said:
On the other hand, if one wishes to keep the invention a trade secret, do not patent it. Technology companies keep the best stuff under wraps, and do not patent/disclose it.

Interesting point. Can you provide some examples?
 
Jupiter6 said:
Interesting point. Can you provide some examples?

Adderall medication - its a combination of 4 ingredients, but the manufacturer won't say how its produced so is difficult to copy
Recipes - junk food, Coca cola, various liqueurs
Manufacturing eg Semiconductor production - the general techniques are known but manufactures don't want others to know shortcuts
Google's search algorithms (they change all the time anyway)
 
nukapprentice said:
Hello, I was wondering if someone with patent experience could help me. Is it possible to submit a patent which uses technology which is still in the research phase? If so, how does this differ than one which utilizes technology already out there?

In fact you can't patent technology which is "out there". Once technology is in the public domain, it can no longer be patented. If you start selling some new invention before you have filed a patent, you lose your right to patent it (at least in the US).
 
Jupiter6 said:
Interesting point. Can you provide some examples?
I must decline the examples of which I know, but
Devils said:
Coca cola,
Coke is the best example of a trade secret, but I don't believe it could be patented on the basis of 'usefulness', although someone might attempt such a claim. Perhaps it is useful because it sets the beverage apart from others, and thus CocaCola enjoys a market advantage.

One might patent a product or process with the expectation that it could be discovered by someone familiar with the art. However, one of three requirements is 'non-obviousness', which might apply at the time of discovery, but is not necessarily a permanent condition.
 
Thanks for all the great advice. Phyzguy, when I mentioned a patent which utilizes technology already out there, I meant a novel invention comprised of technology which already exists but used in an original way.

About what Astronuc said, yeah, I guess the 'non-obviousness' part is the largest hurdle IMHO.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K